No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
1 For discussion of a recent case in which a U.S. district court ordered the federal government to allow the defendants to use an MLAT (notwithstanding that its provisions stated that the MLAT was only for the use of prosecutors and gave rise to no rights for defendants), see Zagaris, Bruce, U.S. Extends Its Reach for Evidence, 15 Crim. Just. 5, 56 (2001)Google Scholar (regarding United States v. Hogendoorn, No. A98-O087-CR (JKS) (D. Alaska July 15, 1999) (status conference transcript)).
2 See, e.g., Francisco, Forrest Martin & Richard, J. Wilson, The Rights International Companion to Criminal Law & Procedure (1999)Google Scholar.
3 See, e.g., Bassiouni, M. Cherif , International Extradition: United States Law and Practice (3d rev. ed. 1996)Google Scholar.