Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:35:50.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nicolo v. Creni

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , January 1954 , pp. 166
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See U. S. ex rel. Alvarez v. Savoretti, 205 F. (2d) 544 (5th Cir., June 26, 1953); U. S. ex rel. Kwong Hai Chew v. Shaughnessy, 113 F. Supp. 49 (S.D.N.Y., June 5, 1953).

2 In Barrios-Macias v. Minton, 114 F. Supp. 470 (W. D. Tex., Sept. 3, 1953), the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act was held constitutional despite attacks on it as ex post facto legislation. In U. 8. ex rel. Pincus v. Savoretti, 114 F. Supp. 574 (8. D. Fla., Sept. 16, 1953), deportation was forbidden when the alien had merely made an accidental visit to a foreign port on a fishing trip, his return therefrom not counting as an “entry.” Questions of bail for deportees were involved in U. S. ex rel. Hyndman v. Holton, 205 F. (2d) 228 (7th Cir., June 23, 1953); U. S. ex rel. Belfrage v. Shaughnessy, 113 F. Supp. 56 (S.D.N.Y., June 9, 1953); and U. S. ex rel. Daniman v. Esperdy, 113 F. Supp. 283 (S.D.N.Y., June 24, 1953).

Other deportation questions arose in Caddeo v. McGranery, 202 F. (2d) 807 (Dist. Col., Jan. 15, 1953); Gonzalez-Martinez v. Landon, 203 F. (2d) 196 (9th Cir., Mar. 31, 1953); U. S. ex rel. Carrollo v. Bode, 204 F. (2d) 220 (8th Cir., Apr. 28, 1953); Eubinstein v. Brownell, 206 F. (2d) 449 (Dist. Col., June 11, 1953); Zank v. Landon, 205 F. (2d) 615 (9th Cir., June 19, 1953); U. S. ex rel. Cuevas Diaz v. Shaughnessy, 206 F. (2d) 142 (2nd Cir., July 15, 1953); U. S. ex rel. Bojarchuk v. Shaughnessy, 206 F. (2d) 238 (2nd Cir., Aug. 7, 1953); U. S. ex rel. Dolenz v. Shaughnessy, 206 F. (2d) 392 (2nd Cir., Aug. 11, 1953); U. S. ex. rel Accardi v. Shaughnessy, 206 F. (2d) 897 (2nd Cir., Aug. 11, 1953); U. S. ex rel. “Watts v. Shaughnessy, 206 F. (2d) 616 (2nd Cir., Aug. 18, 1953); U. S. ex rel. Mustafa v. Pederson, 207 F. (2d) 112 (7th Cir., Sept. 21, 1953); Savala-Cisneros v. London, 111 F. Supp. 129 (S.D. Calif., March 11, 1953); Torres v. McGranery, 111 F. Supp. 241 (S. D. Calif., Mar. 11, 1953); Corona v. Landon, 111 F. Supp. 191 (S. D. Calif., Mar. 13, 1953); U. S. ex rel. Yaris v. Shaughnessy, 112 F. Supp. 143 (S.D.N.Y., Apr. 28, 1953); Ovalle v. Landon, 112 F. Supp. 874 (S. D. Calif., May 18, 1953); U. S. ex rel. Abbenante v. Butterfleld, 112 F. Supp. 324 (E. D. Mich., May 20, 1953); Avila-Contreras v. McGranery, 112 F. Supp. 264 (S. D. Calif., May 22, 1953); IT. S. ex rel. Lombardo v. Bramblett, 114 F. Supp. 183 (N. D. Ohio, June 5, 1953); U. S. ex rel. Marcello v. Ahrens, 113 F. Supp. 22 (E. D. La., June 8, 1953); U. S. ex rel. Blankenstein v. Shaughnessy, 112 F. Supp. 607 (S.D.N.Y., June 12, 1953); De Montes v. Landon, 113 F. Supp. 239 (S. D. Calif., June 12, 1953); Smith ex rel. Leung Sing v. Nicolls, 113 F. Supp. 790 (Mass., July 8, 1953); U. S. ex rel. Pappageanakis v. Shaughnessy, 114 F. Supp. 371 (S.D.N.Y., July 14, 1953).