Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:01:33.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Legal Position of Tibet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2017

Charles Henry Alexandrowicz-Alexander
Charles Henry Alexandrowicz-Alexander*
Affiliation:
Research Professor, University of Madras
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Tibet has recently been invaded by Communist China and deprived of independence. The Mao Tse-Tung government justifies the invasion by China’s claim to suzerainty over Tibet, though the latter, before finally disappearing from the international scene, had again and again denied that she was still a vassal of China.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , April 1954 , pp. 265 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 L. Oppenheim, International Law (1952), Vol. I, pp. 170–178; C. C. Hyde, International Law (1945), Vol. I, p. 48 et seq.

2 S. V. Viswanatha, International Law in Ancient India (1925), pp. 26–27; Jessup, P. C., “Palmas Island Arbitration,” this Journal, Vol. 22 (1928), p. 745 Google Scholar.

3 Robert Redslob, Traité de Droit des Gens (1950), p. 126; Jean Escarra, La Chine et le Droit International (1931).

4 C. C. Hyde, op. cit., p. 56 et seq.

5 An Account of Tibet: The Travels of Ippolito Desideri (1932), p. 209.

6 Sven Hedin, “Tibet,” The New Orient (published for the New Orient Society of America), Vol. II, p. 89.

7 L. Austine Waddell, Lhasa and Its Mysteries (1905), pp. 18, 27–28; D. K. Sen, “China, Tibet and India,” India Quarterly, April–June, 1951, p. 112 et seq.

8 Jean Escarra, op. cit., p. 240; L. A. Waddell, op. cit., p. 166; Rockhill, W. W., “Tibet,” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, Vol. 22 (1891), pp. 7 Google Scholar, 203–205.

9 G. Keeton, The Development of Extraterritoriality in China (1928).

10 Percival Landon, The Opening of Tibet (N. Y., 1905), pp. 10–14.

11 Sir Charles Bell, Tibet Past and Present (1924), Appendix V–XIV.

12 Sir Charles Bell, op. cit., Appendix V, p. 281.

13 P. Landon, op. cit., p. 212.

14 Ibid., p. 214; L. A. Waddell, op. cit., p. 52; Arnold J. Toynbee, Survey of International Affairs, 1920–1923, pp. 431–432; T. A. Taracouzio, The Soviet Union and International Law (1935), p. 36.

15 P. Landon, op. cit., pp. 385, 396, 413, 483; Sven Hedin, Central Asia and Tibet (1903), p. 456; L. A. Waddell, op. cit., pp. 413, 418.

16 Bell, op. cit., Appendix VII, pp. 284–286.

17 Bell, op. cit., Appendix VIII, pp. 287–289.

18 Bell, op. cit., Appendix IX, pp. 289–291.

19 Bell, op. cit., p. 61.

20 Nemzer, Louis “The Status of Outer Mongolia in International Law,” this Journal, Vol. 33 (1939), p. 452 Google Scholar et seq.; H. B. Morse and H. F. MacNair, Far Eastern International Relations (1931), p. 567.

21 Bell, op. cit., Appendix XI, p. 297; see also pp. 246–247.

22 Chou Hsiang-Kuang, Modern History of China (1952).

23 L. A. Waddell, op. cit., p. 52.

24 Bell, op. cit., pp. 154–155.

25 D. K. Sen, loc. cit., p. 112 et seq.

26 Bell, op. cit., Appendix XIII, pp. 304–305.

27 Bell, op. cit., Appendix XIII, p. 304.

28 Jean Escaira, op. cit., p. 463.

29 D. K. Sen, loc. cit., p. 112 et seq.