Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-qdpjg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T13:08:53.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laws and Policy of Intergovernmental Primary Commodity Agreements. By Charles R. JohnstonJr. , Dobbs Ferry: Oceana Publications, Inc., 1976 & 1977. Supp. 2 vols. $125.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Andreas F. Lowenfeld
Andreas F. Lowenfeld*
Affiliation:
New York University School of Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 73 , Issue 2 , April 1979 , pp. 309 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, e.g., B. Fisher, The international coffee agreement. A study in coffee Diplomacy (1972). A shorter and earlier version of The same story appears in A. Chayes, T. Ehrlich, A. Lowenfeld, International Legal Process, Vol. I, ch. 8 (1968). I updated The story through 1972 for my students but did not publish The result when it became apparent that as extended beyond 1972, The International Coffee Agreement was only a shell, not a real instrument of international control.

2 The initials are drawn from The Spanish name of The Organization.

3 For some attempt at this, see Chayes, Ehhlich, & Lowenfeld, note 1 supra; see also Lowenfeld, , International Commodity Controls—Some Lessons from The Coffee Agreement, 61 Ajil 785 (1967).Google Scholar

4 In his 1100-page teaching materials on International Economic Relations (1977), Jackson devotes about 12 pages to The subject; in my own series of volumes on International Economic Law (Vols. I-VI (1975-78)), I have thus far not addressed The subject, but I might do so in The context of a volume on economic development if The right focus were to emerge.