Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:57:53.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lawrence Preuss, 1905–1956

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

WM. W. Bishop
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , October 1956 , pp. 907 - 909
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, in addition to the work of the Harvard Research, his articles on “Foreign Diplomats and the Prohibition Laws,” 30 Mich. L. Rev. 333 (1932)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “Capacity for Legation and the Theoretical Basis of Diplomatic Immunities,” 10 N.Y.U.L.Q.R. 170 (1932).Google Scholar

2 See, in particular, “Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities of Agents Invested with Functions of an International Interest,” 25 A.J.I.L. 694 (1931)Google Scholar; “The International Organizations Immunities Act,” 40 ibid. 332 (1946)Google Scholar; “Immunity of Officers and Employees of the United Nations for Official Acts: The Ranollo Case,” 41 ibid. 555 (1947).Google Scholar

3 “The Dispute between Denmark and Norway over the Sovereignty of East Greenland,” 26 A.J.I.L. 469 (1932)Google Scholar; also in Oslo Aftenposten, Sept. 24, 1932.

4 “La répression des crimes et delits contre la sûreté des états étrangers,” 40 Rev. Gén de Droit Int. Pub. 606 (1933).

5 “International Responsibility for Hostile Propaganda against Foreign States,” 28 A.J.I.L. 649 (1934).Google Scholar

6 “La théorie raciale et la doctrine politique du national-socialisme,” 41 Rev. Gén. de Droit Int. Pub. 661 (1934)Google Scholar; “Racial Theory and National Socialist Political Thought,” 15 S.W. Soc. Sci. Q. 1 (1934)Google Scholar; “Germanic Law versus Roman Law in National Socialist Legal Theory,” 16 J. Comp. Leg. & Int. Law 269 (1934)Google Scholar; “Position of Aliens in National Socialist Penal Law Reform,” 29 A.J.I.L. 206 (1935)Google Scholar; “National Socialist Conceptions of International Law,” 29 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 594 (1935)CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; “Punishment by Analogy in National Socialist Penal Law,” 26 J. Crim. Law & Criminology 847 (1936).Google Scholar

7 “International Law and Deprivation of Nationality,” 23 Georgetown L.J. 250 (1935)Google Scholar; “La dénationalisation imposée pour des motifs politiques,” 4 Rev. int. française du droit des gens 10, 241 (1937)Google Scholar; “Denaturalization on the Ground of Disloyalty,” 36 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 701 (1942).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 In addition to contributions to the Annual Digest, see “Jurisprudence américaine en matière de droit international (1933–1935),” 43 Rev. gén. de droit int. pub. 589 (1936); 44 ibid. 561 (1937).

9 “Jurisprudence américaine relative à la reconnaissance de l'U.R.S.S. par les États-Unis (1933–1935),” 44 Rev. g&n de droit int. pub. 199 (1937).

10 “Protection of Foreign Diplomatic and Consular Premises against Picketing,” 31 A.J.I.L. 705 (1937).Google Scholar

11 “State Immunity and the Requisition of Ships during the Spanish Civil War,” 35 A.J.I.L. 263 (1941)Google Scholar; and 36 ibid. 37 (.1942).

12 Some Effects of Governmental Controls on Neutral Duties,” Proceedings, American Society of International Law, 1937, p. 108; “Die Vereinigten Staaten und der spanische Bürgerkrieg,” 4 Völkerbund and Völkerrecht 627 (1938)Google Scholar; “The Concepts of Neutrality and Non-Belligerency,” 218 Ann. Amer. Acad. Pol. & Soc. Sci. 97 (1941).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 In addition to his work on the Harvard Research in this field, and the article cited in footnote 4 above, see “International Law and German Legislation on Political Crime,” 20 Grotius Society Transactions 85 (1935)Google Scholar; “Kidnaping of Fugitives from Justice on Foreign Territory,” 29 A.J.I.L. 502 (1935)Google Scholar; “Der Umfang der Strafgewalt nach amerikanischer Rechtsauffassung,” 5 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht u. Völkerrecht 239 (1935)Google Scholar; “La non-extradition des nationaux dans les relations francoaméricaines,” 3 Rev. int. françhise du droit des gens 159, 244 (1937)Google Scholar; “American Conception of Jurisdiction with respect to Conflicts of Law on Crime,” 30 Grotius Society Transactions 184 (1944).Google Scholar

14 “International Law in the Constitutions of the Länder in the American Zone,” 41 A.J.I.L. 888 (1947)Google Scholar; “The Relation of International Law to Internal Law in the French Constitutional System,” 44 ibid. 641 (1950).Google Scholar Concerning this latter article, one may well agree with the reviewer who described it as “a model of learning and judicious interpretation,” adding that “It is a matter for regret that we do not more frequently have the opportunity of seeing products of his work, which has exerted a weighty influence in favour of the acceptance of the overriding authority of international law.” 28 British Year Book of Int. Law 415 (1951).Google ScholarPubMed

15 “The Execution of Treaty Obligations through Internal Law,” Proceedings, American Society of International Law, 1951, p. 82; “On Amending the Treaty-Making Power: A Comparative Study of the Problem of Self-Executing Treaties,” 51 Mich. Law Rev. 1117 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Such as “International Law and the Individual,” 46 Mich. Alum. Quart. Rev. 1 (1939)Google Scholar; “The International Court of Justice and the Problem of Compulsory Jurisdiction,” 13 Dept. of State Bulletin 471 (1945)Google Scholar; “The International Court of Justice, the Senate, and Matters of Domestic Jurisdiction,” 40 A.J.I.L. 720 (1946)Google Scholar; “Consular Immunities: The Kasenkina Case (U.S.–U.S.S.R.),” 43 ibid. 37 (1949)Google Scholar; “Some Aspects of the Human Rights Provisions of the Charter and their Execution in the United States,” 46 ibid. 289 (1952).Google Scholar