No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
1 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Dec. 10, 1982, 1833 UNTS 397.
2 The South China Sea Arbitration (Phil. v. China), PCA Case No. 2013-19, Award (July 12, 2016) [here in after Final Award].
3 The South China Sea Arbitration(Phil. v. China), PCA Case No. 2013-19, Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility (Oct. 29, 2015).
4 Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, Statementon the Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of the South China Sea Arbitration by the Arbitral Tribunal Established at the Request of the Republic of the Philippines (Oct. 30, 2015). See Final Award, supra note 2, at para. 166.
5 See Lucy Reed & Kenneth Wong, Marine Entitlements in the South China Sea: The Arbitration Between the Philippines and China, 110 AJIL (forthcoming 2016).
6 Kate Parlett, Jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal inPhilippines v. China under UNCLOS and in the Absence of China, 110 AJIL Unbound 266 (2016).
7 Lori Fisler Damrosch, Military Activities in the UNCLOS Compulsory Dispute Settlement System: Implications of the South China Sea Arbi-tration for U.S. Ratification of UNCLOS, 110 AJIL Unbound 273 (2016).
8 Id.at 273.
9 Nilufer Oral, “Rocks” or “Islands”? Sailing Towards Legal Clarity in the Turbulent South China Sea, 110 AJIL Unbound 279 (2016).
10 Makane Mose Mbengue, The South China Sea Arbitration: Innovations in Marine Environmental Fact-Finding and Due Diligence Obligations, 110 AJIL Unbound 285 (2016).
11 Thomas J. Schoenbaum, The South China Sea Arbitration Decision: The Need for Clarification, 110 AJIL Unbound 290(2016).
12 Id. at 291.