Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:00:58.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpretation of “Rights of Custody” Under Hague Convention on Child Abduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 98 , Issue 4 , October 2004 , pp. 851 - 852
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, Oct. 25,1980, TIAS 11, 670, 1343 UNTS 98 [hereinafter Hague Convention].

2 See id., Arts. 12, 13, 20.

3 42 U.S.C. §§11601–11610 (2000).

4 See Furnes v. Reeves, 362 F.3d 702, 704–05 (11th Cir. 2004) (quoting the decision of the Bergen City Court in Norway).

5 Act No. 7 of 8 April 1981 Relating to Children and Parents (The Children Act), at <http://www.lovdata.no/info/ueng.html> .

6 Id. §30.

7 Id. §35(b).

8 Id. §43.

9 362 F.3d at 712 (quoting Hague Convention Articles 3 and 5, and 42 U.S.C. §11603(e)(1)(A)).

10 Id. at 712–14.

11 Id. at 717–18.

12 Id. at 719–22. The court cited Fawcett v. McRoberts, 326 F.3d 491 (4th Cir. 2003), Gonzalez v. Gutierrez, 311 F.3d 942 (9th Cir. 2002), and Croll v. Croll, 229 F.3d 133 (2d Cir. 2000).

13 362 F.3d at 724.