Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:41:47.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Maritime Boundaries (2 vols.). Edited by Jonathan I. Charney and Lewis M. Alexander. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993. Pp. 2138. Index. $850.00; ASIL members, $637.50.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Tullio Treves
Tullio Treves*
Affiliation:
University of Milan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 88 , Issue 1 , January 1994 , pp. 179 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See also Judgment of June 14, 1993, on Maritime Delimitation in the Area between Greenland and Jan Mayen (Den. v. Nor.), 1993 ICJ Rep. 38, 59.

2 ICJ Judgment of October 12, 1984, on Delim itation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area (Can. v. U.S.), 1984 ICJ Rep. 246, 300, para. 112. The Chamber of the Court states that when delimitation is to be effected by agreement, as well as in case such agreement cannot be achieved when delimitation should be effected “by recourse to a third party possessing the necessary competence,” “delimitation is to be effected by the application of equitable criteria and by the use of practical methods capable of ensuring, with regard to the geographic configuration of the area and other relevant circumstances, an equitable result.” Id. at 299–300.

3 1993 ICJ Rep. at 66–67, paras. 64–65.

4 Id., paras. 41–48.

5 1984 ICJ Rep. at 327, paras. 194–95.

6 1993 ICJ Rep. at 71–72, paras. 75–76.