Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:21:49.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In Re Estate of Millers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Copyright
Copyright © The American Society of International Law 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sec. 567.8, Code, 1962, 1966, was quoted by the court as providing: “ (1) The right of aliens not residing within the United States or its territories … to take personal property in this state by succession or testamentary disposition, upon the same terms and conditions as residents and citizens of the United States is dependent in each case upon the existence of a reciprocal right upon the part of citizens of the United States to take personal property upon the same terms and conditions as residents and citizens of the respective countries of which such aliens are residents. (2) The burden shall be upon such non-resident aliens to establish the fact of existence of the reciprocal right set forth in subsection 1.” 159 N.W. 2d 441 at 442-443.

2 E.g., In re Estate of Larkin, 52 Calif. Reporter 441, 416 Pac. 2d 473 (Sup. Ct. Calif., 1966); In re Estate of Chichernea, 57 Calif. Reporter 135, 424 Pac. 2d 687 (Sup. Ct. Calif., 1967), 61 A.J.I.L. 1067 (1967).