Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:40:07.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Hague Convention of 1930 and the Nationality of Women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For the text of the convention, see this Journal, Vol. 24 (Supplement), p. 192.

2 League of Nations Official Journal, 1931, p. 232.

3 League of Nations Document, A. 19. 1931. V.

4 Id., A. 41. 1931. V.

5 League of Nations Official Journal, 1931, Special Supplement No. 93, p. 144.

6 League of Nations Document, A. 15.1932. V; A. 15 (a). 1932. V; A. 15 (b). 1932. V.

7 The report of the First Committee to the Thirteenth Assembly states that observations were made by 33 governments. League of Nations Document, A. 61.1932. V.

8 League of Nations Document, A. 23.1932. V.

9 Id., A. 33. 1932. V.

10 The most significant of these proposals was that by M. Rolin (Belgium), calling for a protocol amending the convention by substituting the word “person” for the word “woman” in Articles 8–11.

11 Verbatim Record of the Thirteenth Assembly, Tenth Meeting, 1932, p. 8.

12 Verbatim Record of the Thirteenth Assembly, Tenth Meeting, 1932, p. 6.

13 Id., p. 9.

14 League of Nations Document, A. 6 (a). 1932. V. Annex.

15 See, especially, Scott, James Brown, “Unprogressive Codification of Nationality at The Hague,” 18 Women Lawyers’ Journal (1930), Nos. 2, 3 and 4, p. 4 Google Scholar ff.