Article contents
The Hague Convention of 1930 and the Nationality of Women
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0002930000135717/resource/name/firstPage-S0002930000135717a.jpg)
- Type
- Editorial Comment
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1933
References
1 For the text of the convention, see this Journal, Vol. 24 (Supplement), p. 192.
2 League of Nations Official Journal, 1931, p. 232.
3 League of Nations Document, A. 19. 1931. V.
4 Id., A. 41. 1931. V.
5 League of Nations Official Journal, 1931, Special Supplement No. 93, p. 144.
6 League of Nations Document, A. 15.1932. V; A. 15 (a). 1932. V; A. 15 (b). 1932. V.
7 The report of the First Committee to the Thirteenth Assembly states that observations were made by 33 governments. League of Nations Document, A. 61.1932. V.
8 League of Nations Document, A. 23.1932. V.
9 Id., A. 33. 1932. V.
10 The most significant of these proposals was that by M. Rolin (Belgium), calling for a protocol amending the convention by substituting the word “person” for the word “woman” in Articles 8–11.
11 Verbatim Record of the Thirteenth Assembly, Tenth Meeting, 1932, p. 8.
12 Verbatim Record of the Thirteenth Assembly, Tenth Meeting, 1932, p. 6.
13 Id., p. 9.
14 League of Nations Document, A. 6 (a). 1932. V. Annex.
15 See, especially, Scott, James Brown, “Unprogressive Codification of Nationality at The Hague,” 18 Women Lawyers’ Journal (1930), Nos. 2, 3 and 4, p. 4 Google Scholar ff.
- 2
- Cited by