Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:55:25.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Greenham Women against Cruise Missiles v. Reagan. 591 F.Supp. 1332

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Plaintiffs contended that deployment of the missiles would contravene provisions of the United Nations Charter regarding the threat or use of force, the right to survival, crimes against peace, laws of war and the crime of genocide.

2 369 U.S. 186(1962).

3 591 F.Supp. 1332, 1336.

4 In this regard, the court relied on the decisions in Crockett v. Reagan, 720 F.2d 1355 (D.C. Cir. 1983) (per curiam); DaCosta v. Laird, 471 F.2d 1146 (2d Cir. 1973); and HoUzman v. Schlesinger, 484 F.2d 1307 (2d Cir. 1973), cert, denied, 416 U.S. 936 (1974).

5 591 F.Supp. at 1337.

6 For instance, enjoining cruise missile deployment could engender serious discord among our allies and unravel the carefully balanced deployment scheme. It could encourage the USSR to intensify its pressure for unilateral Western concessions which would seriously erode NATO’s ability to deter Moscow’s growing nuclear threat or discourage Soviet willingness to reach an arms control agreement.

Id. at 1339.

7 331 F.2d 796 (D.C. Cir. 1963), cert, denied, 377 U.S. 933 (1964).