No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
1 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, Pub. L. No. 100-418, 102 Stat. 1107. See Interim Rules of Practice and Procedure of the ITC, 53 Fed. Reg. 33,055–77 (Aug. 29, 1988).
2 See, e.g., Trade Assoc., Inc. v. Makita Elec. Works, Ltd. (W.D. Wash. 1989) and Jepson, Inc. v. Makita Elec. Works, Ltd. (CD. Cal. 1991) (unpublished).
3 Certain Color Television Receiving Sets, Inv. No. 337-TA-23 (1977); Welded Stainless Steel Pipe and Tube, Inv. No. 337-TA-29, U.S. ITC Pub. No. 863 (1978). Certain Electronically Resistive Monocomponent Toner, Inv. No. 337-TA-256, U.S. ITC Pub. No. 2069 (1988).
4 Coke from West Germany (ITC Docket 554, January 15, 1979); see Syntex Agribusiness, Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission, 659 F.2d 1038 (Fed. Cir. 1981) where the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied a petition seeking a writ of mandamus compelling the Commission to institute a §337 proceeding in this matter. See also In re CF Industries, Appeal No. 83-845, 5 Int’l Trade Rep. (BNA), Decision 1447 (Apr. 25, 1983).
5 See USTR proposals contained in 55 Fed. Reg. 3503 (Feb. 1, 1990), and the Recommendations Addressing Proposed Amendments to Section 337, Committee on Patents, 46 A.B.C.N.Y., Record, March 1991, at 149.