Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-qdpjg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T06:24:39.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

District Court Rejection of Burmese Claims Against Unocal Corporation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2017

Sean D. Murphy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 95 , Issue 1 , January 2001 , pp. 144 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For a parallel case brought by different plaintiffs, see National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma v. Unocal, 176 F.R.D. 329 (CD. Cal. 1997).

2 The Alien Tort Claims Act provides: “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. §1350 (1994).

3 Doe v. Unocal Corp., 963 F. Supp. 880 (CD. Cal. 1997).

4 Doe v. Unocal Corp., 27 F.Supp.2d 1174 (CD. Cal. 1998).

5 Doe v. Unocal Corp., 963 F. Supp. at 889-92.

6 Doe v. Unocal Corp., 110 F.Supp.2d 1294 (CD. Cal. 2000).