Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:05:58.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decision by the Swiss Federal Court Concerning the International and Constitutional Effects of Territorial Possession and the Duty of a Succeeding State to Recognize the Concessions Granted by its Predecessor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions Involving Questions of International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , January 1907 , pp. 235 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1907

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Compare: Max Huber, Ein Beitrag zur Lehre von der Gebietshoheit an Grenz-fluessen, in the first volume of Zeitschrift für Völkerrecht und Bundesstaatsrecht (1906), pp. 29–52, 159–217.

2 According to Art. 110 of the Federal Constitution suits may be brought in the Federal Court in matters of private law between cantons on the one side and private persons or corporations on the other side.

3 An appeal might in a given case take place also on account of the violation of a right guaranteed by the Federal Constitution, e. g., that of freedom of trade or of equality (arbitrary treatment) or of a right guaranteed by the constitution of Schaffhausen.

4 The above case is translated from the first volume of the Zeitschrift für Völkerrecht und Bundesstaatsrecht (1906), pp. 275–283.

5 Zeitschrift für Völkerrecht und Bundesstaatsrecht (1906), pp. 213–217.