Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 April 2017
1 United Nations Weekly Bulletin, Nov. 11, 1947, p. 618; hereafter cited as U.N.W.B.
2 The same, Nov. 4, 1947, p. 579.
3 International Organization, Sept., 1947, Vol. 1, p. 491; U.N.W.B., Nov. 4, 1947, p. 577, Nov. 18, 1947, pp. 649–50.
4 U.N.W.B., Nov. 4, 1947, p. 580.
5 Sen. Res., 441, 67th Cong., 4th Sess., Feb. 1, 1923. See Comment in this Journal, vol. 19 (1925), p. 80.
6 Art. 6, Dept. of State, Trial of War Criminals, 1945, p. 16.
7 Indictment, Sees. III , IV, D,e, and the same, pp. 25, 30.
8 Wright, Q. A Study of War, Chicago, 1942, p. 813 Google Scholar; Myers, Denys P. World Disarmament, Boston, 1932, p. 3.Google Scholar
9 Hudson,, Manley O. Ed., International Legislation, Vol. 7, p. 409 Google Scholar; Myers,, D. P. Handbook of the League of Nations, Boston, 1935, p. 187 Google Scholar; League of Nations Secretariat, Essential Facts about the League of Nations, p. 107.
10 Lauterpacht,, H. “Bevolutionary Activities of Private Persons against Foreign States,”this JOURNAL, Vol. 22 (1928), pp. 105, 126Google Scholar;Lawrence Preuss, “International Responsibility for Hostile Propaganda against Foreign States,” the same, Vol. 28 (1934), p. 649; Van Dyke,, Vernon “The Eesponsibility of States for International Propaganda,” the same, Vol. 34 (1940), pp. 58, 73 and “Autocratic Opposition to Freedom in Foreign States,” The Journal of Politics, Vol. 4 (1942), p. 437.Google Scholar
11 See Wright,, Q. “Denunciation of Treaty Violators,” in this JOURNAL, Vol. 32 (1938), p. 526.Google Scholar
12 Francis Wharton, A Treatise on Criminal Law, Sees. 1594, 1605, 1606, 1611.
13 Van Dyke, pp. 69–70.
14 King vs. Gordon, 22 Howell State Trials 233–34; King vs. Vint, 27 Howell, 641; King vs. Peltier, 28 Howell, 617–18; Case of William Cobbett, Wharton State Trials 325; See. of State Bayard to Mr. Harris, April 2, 1885, 2 Moore’s Digest 430–33; J. F, Stephen, Digest of Criminal Law, Art. 99; Francis Wharton, work cited, Sec. 1612a. See, however, Lauterpacht, work cited, pp. 113–14.
15 VanDyke, p. 71; Wright,, Q. “The Outlawry of War,” this JOURNAL, Vol. 19 (1925), p. 831.Google Scholar
16 U.N.W.B., Nov. 4, 1947, pp. 580, 582.
17 Above, notes 13, 14.
18 Judgment of Nuremberg Tribunal, this JOURNAL, Vol. 41 (1947), p. 56.
19 Wright, Q. “Law of the Nuremberg Trial,” this JOURNAL, Vol. 41 (1947), p. 56.Google Scholar
20 Holmes, J., in Schenck vs. U.S., 1919, 249 U.S. 47, 52, and dissent in Abrams vs. V.S., 1919, 250 U.S. 627, 630.
21 President’s Committee on Civil Eights, To Secure These Rights, Washington, 1947, pp. 49–51.
22 Report of Commission on Freedom of the Press, Hutchins, R. M. Chairman, A Free and Responsible Press, New York, 1947, pp. 16, 18.Google Scholar
23 Finnegan,, E. J. ed., Draft Treaty on Freedom of Information, Chicago, 1947,Arts. 6, 7.Google Scholar
24 Warburg,, James P. Unwritten Treaty, New York, 1946, p. 158. This proposal goes hardly as far as the widely ratified Convention of 1936 (above, n. 9) though the latter dealt only with broadcasting.Google Scholar