Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
1 64 Ajil 717 (1970).
2 Id.; 715 Crim., Oct. 15, 1969, B. 252, at 605-07.
3 A.I.R. (1975) Supreme Court 164.
4 1975 Andhra Pradesh L.J., Vol. I, at 181; I.L.R. (1976) A.P. 109. Regina v. Governor of Pentonville Prison Ex Parte Teja, [1971] 2 W.L.R. 816; petition for leave to appeal to House of Lords dismissed, sub nom. Teja v. Governor of Pentonville Prison, [1971] 1 W.L.R. 678; 66 Ajil 193 (1972).
5 47 Stat. 2122, TS No. 849, 163 LNTS 59.
6 1975 Andhra Pradesh L.J., Vol. I, at 185; I.L.R. (1976) A.P. 116.
7 Ibid.
8 Supra note 3, at 166.
9 [1952] A.C. 109, 132.
10 A number of commentators have endorsed (I believe wisely) The notion of passing legislation on The matter. See The note to The Re Frechengues case, 1969 Gazette Du Palais 3, 4 (Dec. 10-12); Merle and Vitu, 1967 TRAITÉ De Droit Criminel No. 1356, at 1262; and Kenney, supra note 1.