No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2017
1 Reviewed in 54 A.J.I.L. 206 (1960).
2 Reviewed in 56 Hid.1145 (1962).
3 1 A. J. Comp. Law 275 (1952). In Art. 3 of the Convention “branch” must be replaced by “establishment.” The original text may be found in Conférence de La Haye de Droit International Privé, Actes de la Septième (1951) Session, p. 382 (1952); and 40 Revue Critique de Droit International Privé 725 (1951).
4 Off erhaus, ‘ ‘ The Seventh Session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law,” 79 Journal du Droit International 1071, 1077 et seq.(1952); Wortley, “The 1951 Hague Conference on Private International Law,” 38 Grotius Society Transactions 25, 27 et seq.(1953).
5 Volume under review, vii-xi.
6 Ibid,at xi.
7 Currie, “Change of Venue and The Conflict of Laws: A Eetraetion,” 27 TJ. Chicago Law Eev. 341, 343 (1960), reprinted in Currie, Selected Essays on The Conflict of Laws 431, 433 (1963). The above statement is followed by this quote from Babel: “Private law rules ordinarily do not direct which persons or movables they include… . They are simply neutral; the answer is not in them. Generally, therefore, what is needed, or even feasible, is not an interpretation of the statute but a rule of private international law to accompany and delimit the rule of private law.” (Citing 1 Babel 95 (1945).) Compare with this the text to footnote 8 below.
8 1 Babel, Conflict of Laws: A Comparative Study 94-95 (1945) (at 102-103 of the second (1958) edition).