Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2017
Autocracy and Democracy are mutually antagonistic. A dictatorship, whether that of the proletariat or one established by a totalitarian state, is a menace to popular government. We have all seen in the recent past how it has shown itself a foe to liberty; to freedom of the person, freedom of opinion and speech, freedom of the press, and hostile to religious toleration. Autocracy, relying upon force, is necessarily militaristic and readily assumes an aggressive attitude towards other forms of government.
1 St. Paul to the Romane, viii, 37.
2 See The Times (London), Apr. 29, 1919.
3 L’Illustration, March 5, 1938, p. 244, “Si l’on Avait Écouté Pershing.”
4 My diary, Jan. 27, 1918.
5 Archives of Department of State, History of the Treaty of Versailles.
6 Isaiah Bowman, The New World, pp. 263, 264.
7 Bass, The Peace Tangle, p. 149.
8 Bowman, op. cit., pp. 130–131.
9 McLaren, , A Political History of Japan, p. 365.Google Scholar
10 McLaren, , A Political History of Japan, p. 94.Google Scholar
11 See Ito’s Commentary on the Constitution, Chap. I. Also McLaren, op. cit., p. 193, and MacNair, , Par Eastern International Relations, p. 375.Google Scholar
12 See also Kenneth Colegrove, “The Japanese Emperor,” from which this quotation is made, American Political Science Review, Aug. and Oct., 1932.
13 Akagi, , Japan’s Foreign Relations, p. 137.Google Scholar
14 Chamberlin, Japan over Asia.
15 Quincy, Josiah, Shaw’s Journals, p. 114.Google Scholar
16 MacMurray, , China Treaties and Agreements, Vol. II, p. 1236.Google Scholar
17 See China Yesterday and Today, pp. 668–669.
18 International News Service, Paris, Jan. 4, 1938.
19 International News Service, Boston, June 1, 1938.
20 Address to the Congress, Apr. 2, 1917.