Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T02:06:54.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Blackmer Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2017

Edwin D. Dickinson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , April 1932 , pp. 351 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Vol. 25 (1931), pp. 723-7.

2 “The law of Nations does not prevent a State from exercising jurisdiction over its subjects travelling or residing abroad, since they remain under its personal supremacy.” Oppenheim, International Law, 4th ed., vol. I, sec. 145, p. 281; Story, Conflict of Laws, 8th ed., sec. 540, p. 755; Moore's International Law Digest, vol. II, pp. 255, 256; Hyde, International Law, vol.I, sec. 240, p. 424; Borchard, Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad, sec. 13, pp. 21, 22.” [Footnote to the opinion.]

3 “Compare The Nereide, 9 Cranch, 388, 422, 423; Rose v. Himely, 4 Cranch, 241, 279; The Apollon, 9 Wheat. 362, 370; Schibsby v. Westenholz, L. R. 6 Q. B. 155,161. Illustrations of acts of the Congress applicable to citizens abroad are the provisions found in the chapter of the Criminal Code relating to “Offenses against Operations of Government” (U. S. C , Tit. 18, chap. 4; United States v.. Bowman, 260 U. S. 94, 98-102) and the provisions relating to criminal correspondence with foreign governments, Act of Jan. 30,1799,1 Stat. 613, U. S. C , Tit. 18, sec. 5.” [Footnote to the opinion.]

4 “See, also, Hyde, op. cit., vol. 1, sec. 381, pp. 668, 669.” [Footnote to the opinion.]

5 52 Sup. Ct. Rep. 252, 254; 76 L. Ed. 326, 330.

6 “Cf. Dainese v. Hale, 91 U. S. 13,15,16; In re Ross, 140 U. S. 453, 462, 463. See, also, U. S. C, Tit. 22, sees. 71 et seq.; Hyde, op. cit., sec. 488, pp. 828-832.” [Footnote to the opinion.]

7 52 Sup. Ct. Rep. 252,255; 76 L. Ed. 326,331.

8 Ibid.