Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:57:45.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Chase Manhattan Bank. 658 F.2d 875

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Monroe Leigh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 76 , Issue 4 , October 1982 , pp. 847 - 849
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 505 F.Supp. 412 (S.D.N.Y. 1980).

2 31 C.F.R. pt. 515 (1980).

3 On the same day that it rendered this opinion, the Second Circuit (per Kearse, J.) decided three other cases relating to the property of American banks expropriated by the Cuban Government: Banco Para el Comercio Exterior de Cuba v. First Nat’l City Bank, 658 F.2d 913; First Nat’l Bank of Boston (Int’l) v. Banco Nacional de Cuba, 658 F.2d 895; Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co., 658 F.2d 903.

4 The Bernstein exception to the act of state doctrine provides, in effect, that the doctrine does not apply when the executive branch expressly supports adjudication. See Bernstein v. N.V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-Maatschappij, 210 F.2d 375 (2d Cir. 1954); Bernstein v. Van Heyghen Freres Societe Anonyme, 163 F.2d 246 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 332 U.S. 772 (1947).

5 658 F.2d 875, 884.

6 Id. at 885.

7 See Note of Secretary of State Hull, Aug. 22, 1938, 19 Dept. of State Press Releases, No. 465, Aug. 27, 1938, at 140.

8 See, e.g., UNGA Res. 1803 (XVII) on Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources, para. 4.

9 658 F.2d at 894. Chase has not filed a petition of certiorari appealing this decision.

10 The Commission held that “the evaluation of the loss should not be limited to the assets of the bank branches, but should also include compensation for the ever increasing business activities of the branches and the substantial earning potential in connection with such activities.” Claim of the Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., F.C.S.C. Dec. No. CU-6295, at 2 (Oct. 20, 1971) (emphasis added).

11 Treaty Between the United States of America and _______ Concerning the Reciprocal Encouragement and Protection of Investments, draft of Jan. 11, 1982.