Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:27:22.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are Women Human? And Other International Dialogues. By Catharine A. MacKinnon. Cambridge MA.: Harvard University Press, 2006. Pp. viii, 405. Index. $24.50, £18.95, €22.10.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Hilary Charlesworth
Hilary Charlesworth*
Affiliation:
Australian National University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Recent Books on International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 107 , Issue 3 , July 2013 , pp. 719 - 724
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Catharine A. Mackinnon, Sexual Harassment of Working Women:A case of Sex Discrimination (1979).

2 Catharine A. Mackinnon, Toward A Feminist Theory of the State (1989).

3 MacKinnon, Catharine A., Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence, 8 Signs 644 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 see Joan Wallach Scott, The Fantasy of Feminist History 46–48 (2011).

5 Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Ger. v. It.: Greece intervening) (Int’l Ct. Justice Feb. 3, 2012) at http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&case=143&code=ai&p3=4.

6 MacKinnon, Catharine A., Sex, Gender, and international Law, 100 Asil Proc. 243, 248 (2006)Google Scholar.

7 see Chappell, Louise, Contesting Women’s Rights: Charting the Emergence of a Transnational Conservative Patriarchal Network, 20 Global Soc’y 491 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 UN Commission on the Status of Women, Press Release No. WOM/1905, Head of UN Gender Entity Expresses ‘Deep Regret’ as Commission on Status of Women Concludes Without Adopting Agreed Conclusions (Mar.15, 2012) at http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2012/wom1905.doc.htm. See generally statements and discussions by member states and participating groups, UN Commission on the Status of Women, Report on the 56th Session, at http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/56sess.htm#media.

9 see OHCHR, CEDAW Optional Protocol, Juris prudence, at http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CEDAW/Pages/Jurisprudence.aspx. See also A.F. Bayefsky, Jurisprudence CEDAW: List of all final views, at http://www.bayefsky.com/docs.php/area/jurisprudence/treaty/cedaw/opt/0/node/5/type/finalview.

10 See Report on Mexico Produced by the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women Under Article 8 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention, and Reply from the Government of Mexico, UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, 32nd Sess., UN Doc. CEDAW/C/2005/OP.8/Mexico (Jan. 27, 2005), at http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/cedaw32/CEDAW-C-2005-OP.8-MEXICO-E.pdf.

11 Kesic, Vesna, Response to Catharine MacKinnon’s Article ‘Turning Rape into Pornography: Postmodern Genocide,’ 5 Hastings Women’s L.J. 267 (1994)Google Scholar.

12 Kadic v. Karadzic, 70 F.3d 232 (2d Cir. 1995),cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1005 (1996).

13 28 U.S.C. §1350 (2012).