No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
1 Dec. 2, 1946, TIAS No. 1849, 62 Stat. 1716 (1948).
2 Intervenor-appellants Japan Fisheries Association and Japan Whaling Association argued that the imposition of sanctions against a validly objecting member was a violation of international law. The court of appeals rejected this argument in a footnote, noting simply that “[t]here is no prohibition in the Convention against member nations acting unilaterally to force an objecting member . . . to comply with the Convention’s regulations . . . .”. 768 F.2d 426, 429 n.1.
3 The dissent also suggested that the case may not present a justiciable question, owing primarily to the possibility of interfering with the Executive’s conduct of foreign affairs.
4 768 F.2d at 444 (citations omitted).
5 The Supreme Court granted certiorari on Jan. 13, 1986 sub nom. Japan Whaling Ass’n v. American Cetacean Soc’y, 106 S.Ct. 787 (1986).