Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:25:30.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

American Cases on Nationality and Aliens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , January 1954 , pp. 166 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

3 Relying on Moser v. U. S. (1951), 341 U. S. 41, naturalization was allowed a Swiss national who in 1942 and 1944 had applied for relief as a neutral alien from being drafted in the United States, Petition of Berini, 112 F. Supp. 837 (E.D.N.Y., June 15, 1953). Naturalization was rejected where the neutral alien had in 1943 sought draft exemption and now claims that he could not speak English at the time, Petition of MiTanda, 111 F. Supp. 481 (E.D.N.Y., Apr. 8, 1953). Naturalization was denied because of an outstanding deportation order, in Banks v. U. S., 204 F. (2d) 583 (5th Cir., May 19, 1953). The problem of absence from the United States for more than one year during the statutory period, as a self-employed person, was before the court In re Nathan, 114 F. Supp. 361 (S.D.N.Y., July 14, 1953). Other naturalization cases included In re Yoshida, 113 F. Supp. 631 (Hawaii, July 16, 1953); Petition of Benitez, 113 F. Supp. 105 (S.D.N.Y., June 30, 1953). Cancellation of naturalization was involved in Stenerman v. McGranery, 204 F. (2d) 336 (9th Cir., Apr. 30, 1953); U. S. v. Karahalias, 205 F. (2d) 331 (2nd Cir., June 2, 1953); and U. S. v. Accardo, 113 F. Supp. 783 (N. J., July 10, 1953).

4 Expatriation cases included Longobardi v. Dulles, 204 F. (2d) 407 (Dist. Col., May 7, 1953); Takehara v. Dulles, 205 F. (2d) 560 (9th Cir., June 11, 1953); Valdez v. McGranery, 114 F. Supp. 173 (S. D. Calif., Feb. 6, 1953); Application of Bernasconi, 113 F. Supp. 71 (N. D. Calif., June 2, 1953); In re Torchia, 113 F. Supp. 192 (M. D. Pa., June 26, 1953); Scardino v. Acheson, 113 F. Supp. 754 (N. J., July 20, 1953); Iavarone v. Dulles, 113 F. Supp. 932 (Dist. Col., July 20, 1953); In re Alfonso, 114 F. Supp. 280 (N. J., July 31, 1953).

5 U. S. ex Tel. Alcorn v. District Director, 111 F. Supp. 586 (S.D.N.Y., Mar. 24, 1953); Avina v. Brownell, 112 F. Supp. 15 (S. D. Tex., Apr. 15, 1953); Ng Gwong Dung v. Brownell, 112 F. Supp. 673 (S.D.N.Y., June 10, 1953); D'Argento v. Dulles, 113 F. Supp. 933 (Dist. Col., July 24, 1953); Vasquez v. Brownell, 113 F. Supp. 722 (W. D. Tex., July 27, 1953); Gonzalez-Gomez v. Brownell, 114 F. Supp. 660 (S. D. Calif., Sept. 8, 1953). Questions of sufficiency of evidence to establish citizenship were involved in Wong Gum v. McGranery, 111 F. Supp. 114 (N. D. Calif., Mar. 24, 1953); Yep Why Sun v. Dulles, 111 F. Supp. 30 (N. D., Tex., Mar. 28, 1953); and Eng Bok Chun v. Brownell, 111 F. Supp. 454 (Dist. Col., Apr. 22, 1953).

6 206 F. (2d) 586 (3rd Cir., July 24, 1953).

7 206 F. (2d) 592 (3rd Cir., July 29, 1953).

8 207 F. (2d) 37 (Dist. Col., Aug. 6, 1953).

9 205 F. (2d) 553 (9th Cir., June 17, 1953).

10 203 F. (2d) 804 (9th Cir., Apr. 24, 1953).