Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:04:15.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Administration Urges Senate Action on Law of the Sea Convention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 99 , Issue 2 , April 2005 , pp. 498 - 500
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 On the commission’s preliminary report, see Murphy, Sean D., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 98 AJIL 590 (2004)Google Scholar.

2 The U.S. Ocean Action Plan is available at <http://www.ocean.ceq.gov>. Some found the action plan insufficiently vigorous. At Sea over Oceans, Editorial, Wash. Post, Dec. 23, 2004, at A22 Google Scholar.

3 Dep’t of State Press Statement, U.S. Ocean Action Plan (Dec. 17, 2004), at <http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2004/>.

4 Testimony of Condoleeza Rice, Secretary of State Nomination Hearing, Senate Foreign Relations Committee (Jan. 18, 2005) (on file with author).

5 Written Responses by Condoleeza Rice to Questions from Senator Richard G. Lugar [Concerning UN Law of the Sea Convention], Nomination Hearing for Dr. Condoleeza Rice, [Senate Committee on Foreign Relations,] January 18 & 19, 2005 (section on benefits for national security) (on file with author).

6 Id. (sections on economic benefits, military operations, weapons of mass destruction, Proliferation Security Initiative, role of United Nations, taxation by International Seabed Authority, technology transfer, U.S. sovereignty over ocean resources, and effect of 1994 implementing agreement).