Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:12:12.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Treaties—effect of war and Versailles Treaty provisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

William W. Bishop Jr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , July 1952 , pp. 573 - 575
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The court cited Clark v. Allen, 331 U. S. 503 (1947), this Journal, Vol. 42 (1948), p. 201; Techt v. Hughes, 229 N. Y. 222, 128 N. E. 185 (1920); State ex rel. Miner v. Reardon, 120 Kan. 614, 245 Pac. 158 (1926); Goos v. Brocks, 117 Neb. 750, 223 N. W. 13 (1929); and The Sophie Rickmers, 45 P. (2d) 413 (S. D. N. Y. 1930).

2 Citing Hackworth, Digest of International Law, Vol. 5, pp. 387–390 (1943); the court did not, however, allude to the fact that Hackworth reports the Department of State as having written in 1923 that a treaty which was not notified under Article 289 was considered to be no longer in force, ibid., pp. 388–389.

3 Citing State ex rel. Miner v. Reardon, 120 Kan. 614, 245 Pac. 158 (1926).