Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:35:48.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State Immunity: An Analytical and Prognostic View. By Gamal Moursi Badr. The Hague, Boston, Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1984. Pp. viii, 243. Appendixes. Index. Table of Cases. Dfl.120; £30.50; $46.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Harold G. Maier
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 80 , Issue 3 , July 1986 , pp. 758 - 762
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 S.S. Lotus (Fr. v. Turk.), 1927 PCIJ, ser. A, No. 10 (Judgment of Sept. 7).

2 “[T]he first and foremost restriction imposed by international law upon a State is that. . . it may not exercise its power in any form in the territory of another State.” Id. at 18, quoted in the book under review at p. 159 n.43.

3 S.S. Lotus, 1927 PCIJ, ser. A, No. 10, at 23.

4 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976, 28 U.S.C. §§1330, 1602–1611 (1982).

5 The Schooner Exchange v. M’Faddon, 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 116 (1812).

6 Id. at 144.

7 See, e.g., de Vattel, E., The Law of Nations 3–8 (Fenwick, C. trans. 1916)Google Scholar.

8 Compare Restatement of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (Revised) §403(3) (Tent. Draft No. 2, 1981) with id. §403(3) (Tent. Draft No. 7, 1986).