Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:56:05.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nationals Abroad: Globalization, Individual Rights, and the Making of Modern International Law. By Christopher A. Casey. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2020. Pp. xii, 298. Index.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2021

Peter J. Spiro
Peter J. Spiro*
Affiliation:
Temple University Law School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 115 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 573 - 576
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press for The American Society of International Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Most familiar to U.S. scholars of the subject will be Edwin Borchard, who published a magisterial treatment of diplomatic protection in 1915. Edwin M. Borchard, Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad: or the Law of International Claims (1915). This book, uniquely among other contemporary treatments, also considers important continental sources, working from the author's apparent command of French, German, and Italian.

2 The naturalization rate was much lower in Latin America. See Acosta, Diego, The National Versus the Foreigner in South America: 200 Years of Migration and Citizenship Law 53 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Casey tells the interesting story of how, at least before the adoption of the League of Nations mandate system, imperial subjects enjoyed protection on par with their metropolitan overlords. “In the international realm there was a theoretical legal equality that was impossible domestically” (p. 65).

4 For other more narrowly framed, historical treatments of these disputes, see Lucy E. Salyer, Under the Starry Flag: How a Band of Irish Americans Joined the Fenian Revolt and Sparked a Crisis Over Citizenship (2018) and Nathan Perl-Rosenthal, Citizen Sailors: Becoming American in the Age of Revolution (2015).

5 As Casey notes, this perspective was “selective,” given existing controls on putatively undesirable immigrants (p. 119). The late nineteenth century saw the imposition of racist immigration measures in the United States in the form of the Chinese Exclusion laws.