Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:45:23.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Menendez v. Saks and Company. 485 F.2d 1355

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Menendez, Garcia y Cía., Ltda., F. Palicio y Cía., S.A., Tabacalera José L. Piedra, S.A., Por Larranga, S.A., Cifuentes y Cía. (hereinafter referred to as “owners”).

2 Saks and Co., Faber, Coe & Gregg, Alfred Dunhill of London (hereinafter referred to as “importers”).

3 256 F.Supp. 481 (S.D.N.Y. 1966), aff’d. 375 F.2d 1011 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. den. sub nom. Brush v. Republic of Cuba, 389 U.S. 830 (1967); 61 AJIL 601 (1967).

4 376 U.S. 398 (1964); 58 AJIL 779 (1964).

5 Menendez v. Faber, Coe & Gregg, Inc., 345 F.Supp. 527 (S.D.N.Y. 1972); 67 AJIL338 (1973).

6 353 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. den. 382 U.S. 1027 (1966); 60 AJIL 592 (1966).

7 485 F.2d 1355, 1364.

8 Ibid., 1366 (emphasis by court).

9 60 Stat. 1401; TIAS 1501; 2 UNTS 39.

10 485 F.2d 1355, 1366–67.

11 French v. Banco Nacional de Cuba, 295 N.Y.S.2d 433 (Ct.App.N.Y. 1968); 63 AJIL 640 (1969).

12 345 F.Supp. 527, 545.

13 485 F.2d 1355, 1370.

14 Ibid.

15 22U.S.C. §2370(e)(2).

16 431 F.2d 394 (2d Cir. 1970); 65 AJIL 195 (1971).

17 406 U.S. 759 (1972); 66 AJIL 856 (1972); footnote by court (other footnotes omitted.)

18 See, Appendix, for text, Banco Nacional de Cuba v. First National City Bank, 442F.2d530 (2d Cir. 1971).

19 Bernstein v. N.V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche, 210 F.2d 375 (2d Cir. 1954) (cited by court).

20 National City Bank v. Republic of China, 348 U.S. 356 (1955) (cited by Court).

21 485 F.2d l355, 1373–74.