Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-h6jzd Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-02-26T21:26:58.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Leticia Dispute between Colombia and Peru

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2017

L. H. Woolsey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , April 1933 , pp. 317 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See “ Boundary Disputes in Latin America, ” this Journal, Vol. 25 (1931), p. 324, 331

2 This agreement provides, among other things, that “ At no time shall there be fomented in their territorial jurisdiction, revolutions, enlistments or expeditions, nor carried out against any of the contracting nations. ”

3 For a discussion of this subject with reference to paragraph 8 of Article XV of the League Covenant, see Advisory Opinion, Series B, No. 4, of the Permanent Court of International Justice; Habicht, Post-War Treaties, p. 997; ProfessorBrierly, , “Matters of Domestic Jurisdiction, ” British Yearbook of International Law, 1925, pp. 9-19 Google Scholar; ProfessorFenwick, , “ The Scope of Domestic Questions in International Law, ” this Journal, Vol. 19 (1925), p. 146 Google Scholar. For remarks on the scope of Art. I of the 1929 treaty, see Proceedings of International Conference of American States, 1929, pp. 288, 290, 296, 364.