Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:01:53.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

D.C. Circuit Reverses Lower Court, Holds Bagram Detainees Not Entitled to Habeas Corpus Relief

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 104 , Issue 3 , July 2010 , pp. 508 - 510
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Maqaleh v. Gates, 605 F.3d 84 (D.C. Cir. May 21, 2010); see Savage, Charlie An Appeals Panel Denies U.S. Court Access, N.Y. Times, May 22, 2010, at A1 Google Scholar; Finn, Peter Bagram Detainees Lose Appeals, Wash. Post, May 22, 2010, at A5 Google Scholar; Backward at Bagram, Editorial, N.Y. Times, June 1, 2010, at A22 Google Scholar.

2 For analysis of the court’s decision, see Patel, Faiza The Writ Stops Here: No Habeas for Prisoners Held by U.S. Forces in Afghanistan, ASIL Insights (June 3, 2010)Google Scholar.

3 339 U.S. 763 (1950).

4 53 U.S. 723 (2008).

5 605 F.3d at 93–94.

6 Id. at 96.

7 [Editor’s Note: See John R. Crook, Contemporary Practice of the United States, 103 AJIL 771 (2009).]

8 605 F.3d at 96 (citation omitted).

9 Id. at 96–97.

10 Id. at 97–98 (citation omitted).