No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2017
No. 242, October Term, 1937.
2 This JOURNAL, Vol. 20 (1926), p. 811.
3 In The Jupiter, 1924 P. 236, 241, 244 (compare The Jupiter No. 2, a1925 P. 69; The Jupiter No. 3, 1927 P. 122, 125), and in the recently reported The Christina, 59 Lloyd’s List Law Reports 43, 50, on which respondent relies, the possession taken in behalf of the claimant government was actual. The judgment in The Christina appears to have proceeded on that ground. In The Jupiter, it appeared that before the suit was brought the master had repudiated the possession and ownership of the plaintiffs and held the vessel for the claimant government. The report of The Christina in the Admiralty Division, 59 Lloyd’s List Law Reports 1, 3, indicates that the master and crew were in the pay of the Spanish Government.