Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:58:47.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ceylon Oil Expropriations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Chittharanjan Amerasinghe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comments
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 58 , Issue 2 , April 1964 , pp. 445 - 450
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sec. 34, Act No. 28 of 1961; 1 Int. Legal Materials 126 at 137 (1962).

2 Sec. 5B. 2 Int. Legal Materials 951 at 952 (1963).

3 U. S. Information Service Bulletin of Feb. 8, 1963, as reported in the Times of Ceylon of Feb. 9, 1963.

4 Ibid.

5 See, e.g.,De Visscher, Theories et Rfialitfis en Droit International Public 238 (1953) ; Friedman, Expropriation in International Law 206 (1953); Freeman, Denial of Justice 577 (1938); and Fischer Williams, “International Law and the Property of Aliens,“ 9 Brit. Yr. Bk. Int. Law 1 et seq. (1928).

6 Res. A/1803 (XVII), Dec. 14, 1962; 57 A.J.I.L. 710(1963).

7 307 F. 2d 845; reported in 56 A.J.I.L. 1085 at 1101 (1962).

8 See the U.K. Memorial in the Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. Case (U.K. v.Iran), I.C.J. Pleadings, Oral Arguments and Documents 106 (1951).

9 In this context the recent statement of Lord McNair, that compensation should he paid either at the time the property is taken or that reasonable steps for the payment of compensation should be taken (see “The Seizure of Property and Enterprises in Indonesia,” 6 Neth. Int. Law Rev. 218 at 243 (1959)), is important in this connection as a concession.

10 See, e.g.,The Case Concerning the Factory at Chorz6w (Claim for Indemnity— Merits), P.C.I.J., Series A, No. 17 (1928) at 51-52; and The Vinland Case (Admin. Dec. No. 7, U. S.-German Mixed Claims Commission), 7 Int. Arb. Awards 243.

11 See The Cooperative Committee on Japanese Canadians v.Atty.-Gen. for Canada, [1947] A.C. 87 at 104, where the principle was recognized as valid.

12 Part V, Sees. 55-65.

13 See the Finnish Ships Arbitration (1934), 3 Int. Arb. Awards 1479.