Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:15:59.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bergesen v. Joseph Muller Corporation. 710 F.2d 928

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 June 10, 1958, 21 UST 2517, TIAS No. 6997, 330 UNTS 38.

2 548 F. Supp. 650, 651 (S.D.N.Y. 1982), summarized in 77 AJIL 308 (1983).

3 This issue had been previously posed but left unresolved in the Second Circuit. See, e.g., Andros Compania Maritima, S.A. v. Marc Rich & Co., A.G., 579 F.2d 691, 699 n. 11 (2d Cir. 1978).

4 See Haight, G., Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958)Google Scholar; Contini, , International Commercial Arbitration, 8 Am. J. Comp. L. 283 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 710 F.2d 928, 932.

6 Id.

7 See Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co., 417 U.S. 506, 520 n.15 (1974).

8 710 F.2d at 933.

9 See Sumitomo Corp. v. Parakopi Compania Maritima, 477 F. Supp. 737, 740–41 (S.D.N.Y. 1979).

10 710 F.2d at 933.

11 No. P 627/79/ha (Schweizerisches Bundesgericht, June 19, 1980).