Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:59:44.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Widespread adoption of non-conventional agriculture: Profitability and impacts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Sandra S. Batie  and
Daniel B. Taylor
Sandra S. Batie
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Daniel B. Taylor
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Get access

Abstract

Conventional agriculture is increasingly criticized as being too concentrated in ownership; too reliant on technology, petroleum-based inputs, and credit; too specialized and ecologically unsound; and too dependent on government subsidies. Alternative agriculture is offered by many as an alternative, and we discuss the possible impacts of its widespread adoption on farm income, yields, regions, labor, trade, environmental quality, and farm structure. The profitability of alternative agriculture is also examined - in so doing, a distinction is made between the adoption of low-input practices and a more holistic alternative agricultural system.

Keywords

organic agricultureconventional agriculturelow-input agriculturealternative agriculturefertilizerspesticides
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 4 , Issue 3-4 , December 1989 , pp. 128 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Andrews, M. 1985. Summary: Technology Transfers. In Edens, T. C., Fridgen, C., and Battenfield, S. L. (eds.). Sustainable Agriculture and Integrated Farming Systems: 1984 Conference Proceedings. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 298–302.Google Scholar
2.Batie, S. S. 1988. Agriculture as the problem: New agendas and new opportunities. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 20:1–11.Google Scholar
3.Bealer, R. C., and Dalecki, M. G.. 1985. Regenerative agriculture: One more river to cross. In Edens, T. C., Fridgen, C., and Battenfield, S. L. (eds.). Sustainable Agriculture and Integrated Farming Systems: 1984 Conference Proceedings. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 233–243.Google Scholar
4.Benbrook, C. M. 1987. Low-input agriculture and national policy: How healthy is the connection? Paper presented at the New Directors for Rural Communities meeting, Bozeman, Montana, October 20.Google Scholar
5.Blair, D. 1989. Human health and sustainable agriculture. Paper presented at the Third Annual Virginia Conference on Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Charlottesville, Virginia, March 13–14.Google Scholar
6.Buttel, F. H., and Gertler, M. E.. 1982. Agricultural structure, agricultural policy and environmental quality: Some observations on the context of agricultural research in North America. Agriculture and Environment 9:101–119.Google Scholar
7.Buttel, F. H., Gillespie, G. W. Jr., Janke, R., Caldwell, B., and Sarrantonio, M.. 1986. Reduced-input agricultural systems: Rationale and prospects. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 1:58–64.Google Scholar
8.Buttel, F. H., Gillespie, G. W. Jr., and Power, A.. 1988. Sociological aspects of sustainability in the U.S.: A New York case study. Paper presented at the International Conference on Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Columbus, Ohio, September 19–23.Google Scholar
9.Cacek, T., and Langner, L.. 1986. The economic implications of organic farming. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 1:25–29.Google Scholar
10.Carlson, G. A. 1988. Economic adjustment to sustainable agriculture: Discussion. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70:1175–1176.Google Scholar
11.Cochrane, William. 1979. The Development of American Agriculture. The University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.Google Scholar
12.Coleman, E. W. 1982. Impediments for adoption of an ecological system of agriculture. In Agriculture, Changes and Human Values: Proceedings of a Multidisciplinary Conference, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. 2:580–596.Google Scholar
13.Crosson, P., and Ekey, J.. 1988. Alternative agriculture: A review and assessment of the literature. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. Discussion paper ENR88-01.Google Scholar
14.Crosson, P., and Ostrov, J. E.. 1988. Alternative agriculture: Sorting out its environmental benefits. Resources 92:13–16.Google Scholar
15.Daberkow, S. G., and Reichelderfer, K. H.. 1988. Low-input agriculture: Trends, goals, and prospects for input use. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70:1159–1166.Google Scholar
16.Dahlberg, Kenneth A. 1985. Ethics, values, and goals in agricultural systems and agricultural research. In Edens, T. C., Fridgen, C., and Battenfield, S. L. (eds.). Sustainable Agriculture and Integrated Farming Systems: 1984 Conference Proceedings. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 202–218.Google Scholar
17.Evenson, R., and Kramer, R. A.. 1988. Public policy, technology, and the structure of U.S. agriculture: Some econometric evidence. Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting in Knoxville, Tennessee, August 1–3.Google Scholar
18.Flora, C. B., and Flora, J. L.. 1989. An historical perspective on institutional transfer. In Cempton, J. L. (ed.). The Transformation of International Agricultural Research and Development. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 7–31.Google Scholar
19.Foster, T. H. 1988. Sustainable agriculture: Implications for NFDC. Tennessee Valley Authority National Fertilizer Development Center, Muscle Shoals, Alabama. Draft, Discussion document.Google Scholar
20.French, E. C., and Schmitt, D. L.. 1985. Appropriate technology: An important first step. In Edens, T. C., Fridgen, C., and Battenfield, S. L. (eds.). Sustainable Agriculture and Integrated Farming Systems: 1984 Conference Proceedings. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 262–267.Google Scholar
21.Galston, W. A. 1985. A Tough Row to Hoe: The 1985 Farm Bill and Beyond. Hamilton Press, New York, New York.Google Scholar
22.Hallberg, M. C. 1988. The U.S. Agricultural and Food System: A Postwar Historical Perspective. The Pennsylvania State University, Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development, College Park, Pennsylvania. Pub. No. 55.Google Scholar
23.Halloway, H. A., and Hoag, D. A.. 1989. Goals and methods of low-input sustainable agriculture: Implications for economists. Paper presented at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting in Nashville, Tennessee, February 5–7.Google Scholar
24.Harshbarger, C., and Stahl, S.. 1974. Economic concentration in agriculture trends and developments. Monthly Review. Federal Reserve Bank, Kansas City, Kansas, April.Google Scholar
25.Hayden, F. G. 1984. A geobased national agricultural policy for rural community enhancement, environmental vitality and income stability. Journal of Economic Issues 18:181–221.Google Scholar
26.Heffernan, W. D. 1986. Review and evaluation of social externalities. In Dahlberg, K. A. (ed.). New Directions for Agriculture and Agricultural Research. Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, New Jersey, pp. 199–220.Google Scholar
27.Kaufman, M. 1985. The pastoral ideal and sustainable agriculture. In T. C. Edens, C. Fridgen, and S. L. Battenfield (eds.). Sustainable Agriculture and Integrated Farming Systems: 1984 Conference Proceedings. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 219–232.Google Scholar
28.Knutson, R. D., Penn, J. B., and Boehm, W. T.. 1983. Agricultural and Food Policy. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
29.Leibenluft, R. F. 1981. Competition in Farm Inputs: An Examination of Four Industries. Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
30.Libby, L. 1985. Summary: Economics. In T. C. Edens, C. Fridgen, and S. L. Battenfield (eds.). Sustainable Agriculture and Integrated Farming Systems: 1984 Conference Proceedings. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 117–120.Google Scholar
31.Lockeretz, W. 1986. Alternative agriculture. In Dahlberg, K. A. (ed.). New Directions for Agriculture and Agricultural Research. Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, New Jersey, pp. 291–311.Google Scholar
32.Lockeretz, W., Shearer, G., and Kohl, D. H.. 1981. Organic farming in the Corn Belt. Science 211:540–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Luna, J. 1988. Defining sustainable agriculture. Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Virginia Conference on Sustainable Agriculture, Harrisonburg, Virginia, March 5.Google Scholar
34.Madden, P. 1988. Low-input/sustainable agricultural research and education - Challenges to the agricultural economics profession. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70:1167–1172.Google Scholar
35.Norris, P. 1988. A case study of investment in agricultural sustainability: Adoption and policy issues for nitrogen pollution control in the Chesapeake Bay drainage. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Agricultural Economics, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
36.Olson, K. D., Langley, J., and Heady, E. O.. 1982. Widespread adoption of organic farming practices: Estimated impacts on U.S. agriculture. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 37:41–45.Google Scholar
37.Penn, J. B. 1979. The structure of agriculture: An overview of the issue. In Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service, Structure Issue of American Agriculture. Agricultural Economics 428. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. pp. 2–23.Google Scholar
38.Pfeiffer, M. 1983. Social origins of three systems of farm production in the United States. Rural Sociology 48:340–512.Google Scholar
39.Reichelderfer, K., and Phipps, T. T.. 1988. Agricultural Policy and Environmental Quality: A Briefing Book. National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
40.Ruttan, V. W. 1982. Agricultural Research Policy. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.Google Scholar
41.Sheppard, P. T. 1985. Moral conflict in agriculture: Conquest or moral coevolution? In T. C. Edens, C. Fridgen, and S. L. Battenfield (eds.). Sustainable Agriculture and Integrated Farming Systems: 1984 Conference Proceedings. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 244–255.Google Scholar
42.Stoddard, F. O. 1980. Small Business Problems in the Marketing of Meat and Other Commodities. U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Small Business, Washington, DC. Part 7:27.Google Scholar
43.Taylor, D. B. 1989. Barriers to the adoption of low-input, sustainable agriculture. Paper presented at the Third Annual Virginia Conference on Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Charlottesville, Virginia, March 13–14.Google Scholar
44.Wallace, L. T. 1988. U.S. agriculture in the year 2000. In Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy 3(21):6–12.Google Scholar