Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:40:50.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why consider alternative production systems?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Robert I. Papendick
Robert I. Papendick
Affiliation:
Soil scientist, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pullman, WA 99164-6421.
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentary
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , Spring 1987 , pp. 83 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Hallberg, G. R. 1986. From hoes to herbicides: Agriculture and ground water quality. J. Soil and Water Conserv. 41, 357–364.Google Scholar
2.Jackson, W., and Bender, M.. 1984. Investigations into perennial polyculture. In: Jackson, Wes, Berry, Wendell, and Coleman, Bruce (eds.). Meeting Expectations of the Land. North Point Press, San Francisco, California, pp. 183–194.Google Scholar
3.Lovins, A. B., Lovins, L. H., and Bender, M.. 1984. Energy and agriculture. In: Jackson, Wes, Berry, Wendell, and Coleman, Bruce (eds.). Meeting the Expectations of the Land. North Point Press, San Francisco, California, pp. 68–86.Google Scholar
4.Melichar, E. 1987. Financial condition of agricultural banks: Supplemental report to the AAEA task force on financial stress. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Washington, DC. 02 20, 1987.Google Scholar
5.Papendick, R. I., and Elliott, L. F.. 1984. Tillage and cropping systems for erosion control and efficient nutrient utilization. In: Bezdicek, D. F., Power, J. F., Keeney, D. R., and Wright, M. J. (eds.). Organic Farming: Current technology and its role in a sustainable agriculture. American Society of Agronomy Special Publication No. 46. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 69–81.Google Scholar
6.Power, J. F., and Follett, R. F.. 1987. Monoculture. Scientific American 255:78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1980. Report and Recommendations on Organic Farming. U.S. Department of Agriculture. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. 94 pp.Google Scholar
8.U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1983. 1984 Fact book of U.S. Agriculture. Miscellaneous Publication No. 1063. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
9.Youngberg, I. G., Parr, J. F., and Papendick, R. I.. 1984. Potential benefits of organic farming practices for wildlife and natural resources. Trans. N. Amer. Wildl. and Natur. Resour. Conf. 49:141–153.Google Scholar