Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:44:24.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Whole farm systems research: An integrated crop and livestock systems comparison study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

John Luna
Affiliation:
Sustainable Agriculture Coordinator, Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331;
Vivien Allen
Affiliation:
Professor and Associate Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061.
Joseph Fontenot
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Animal Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061.
Lee Daniels
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061.
David Vaughan
Affiliation:
Professor, Dept of Agricultural Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061.
Scott Hagood
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061.
Daniel Taylor
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061.
Curtis Laub
Affiliation:
Research Associate, Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061.
Get access

Abstract

To examine the long-term productivity, profitability, and ecological interactions associated with whole farming systems, we established an interdisciplinary replicated comparison of a conventional and an experimental alternative crop-livestock farming system in southwest Virginia in 1988. The conventional system uses the best management practices commonly used in the mid-Atlantic region. The alternative system puts more emphasis on crop rotation, grazing and forage management, conservation tillage, cover crops, and integrated pest management. Each is managed as a year-round system, with management decisions based on the system's overall goals.

The comparison is planned to run for 10 years, so that only preliminary conclusions can be drawn so far. These include the following: 1) similar total productivity can be achieved with either reduced or full use of herbicides and insecticides; 2) the need for N fertilization can be decreased using grazing management and short-rotation alfalfa; and 3) recycling of manure from cattle fed corn silage provides most nutrients needed for the following corn crop. The comparative profitability of the two systems has fluctuated among years, and it is too early to know which system is more profitable. The process of interdisciplinary systems research has increased our knowledge of total system interactions, challenged prior assumptions, and clarified the methodological problems of integrated systems research.

Type
Selected Papers from the Conference on Science and Sustainability, Seattle, Washington, October 24–26, 1993
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Allen, V.G., Fontenot, J.P., Green, W.P., and Hammes, R.C. Jr., 1989. Year-round grazing systems for beef production from conception to slaughter. In Proceedings of the XVI International Grasslands Congress, Nice, France. pp. 11971198Google Scholar
2.Allen, V., Daniels, L., Evanylo, G., Fontenot, J., Hagood, S., Laub, C., Luna, J., Taylor, D., Vaughan, D., and Youngman, R.. 1993. Sustainable crop and livestock systems for the Southeastern United States. 1992 Progress Report to the USDA-SARE Program. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg.Google Scholar
3.Bezdicek, D.F., and Granatstein, D.. 1989. Crop rotation efficiencies and biological diversity in farming systems. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 4:111119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Blaser, R. E. 1986. Forage-animal management systems. Virginia Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 86–7. Blacksburg.Google Scholar
5.Forney, D.R., Foy, C.L., and Wolf, D.D.. 1985. Weed suppression in notill alfalfa (Medicago sativa) by prior cropping of summer-annual forage grasses. Weed Science 33:490497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Francis, C.A., and Clegg, M. D.. 1990. Crop rotations in sustainable agricultural systems. In Edwards, C., Lal, R., Madden, P., Miller, R.H., and House, G. (eds). Sustainable Agricultural Systems. Soil and Water Conservation Soc., Ankeny, Iowa. pp. 107122.Google Scholar
7.Krysan, J.L., Foster, D.E., Branson, T.F., Ostlie, K.R., and Cranshaw, W.S.. 1986. Two years before the hatch: Rootworms adapt to crop rotation. Bull. Entomological Soc. Amer. 32:250–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Laub, C.A., and Luna, J.M.. 1991. Influence of winter cover crop suppression practices on seasonal abundance of armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), cover crop regrowth, and yield in no-till corn. Environmental Entomology 20(2):749754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Levine, E., and Oloumi-Sadeghi, H.. 1991. Management of diabroticite rootworms in corn. Annual Review of Entomology 36:229255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Luna, J.M., Allen, V.G., Daniels, W.L., Fontenot, J.P., Sullivan, P.G., Laub, C.A., Stone, N.D., Vaughan, D.H., Hagood, E.S., and Taylor, D.B.. 1991. Lowinput crop and livestock systems in the southeastern United States. In Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education in the Field. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. pp. 183205Google Scholar
11.Vaughan, D.H., Luna, J.M., Laub, C.A., and Ess, D.D.. 1992. Strip tillage in reduced chemical input corn production. Paper No. 921559, Winter Meeting, Amer. Soc. Agric. Engineers, Nashville, Tennessee.Google Scholar