No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Use of soil tests among organic farmers in New England
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 October 2009
Abstract
This research explores the soil testing practices and interests of organic farmers in New England. Data were collected through telephone surveys conducted between December 1998 and January 1999 with 81 certified organic farmers. Organic farmers' commitment to the maintenance of healthy soils necessitates the use of soil evaluation tools. However, it is becoming increasingly understood that a complete picture of soil quality cannot be created solely through the use of laboratory soil tests. For example, many of the soil's critical physical characteristics are more suited to in-field assessment than to laboratory analysis. For this reason, utilization of both laboratory and on-farm tests was investigated. The use of evaluation tools can be influenced by the degree to which laboratory and farming services help organic farmers put test results into practice. Thus, additional questioning focused on the ease of understanding test results, the usefulness of soil test results and recommendations to organic farmers, and the likelihood of turning to expert help when soil management issues arise. Results indicate that in managing their soils, organic farmers in New England rely heavily on laboratory tests provided by public institutions. Most farmers were satisfied with laboratory services and found test results easy to interpret. Over one-quarter (31%) of the farmers surveyed were employing on-farm tests, but very few of these tests assessed physical or biological characteristics of the soil. Organizations most often sought by organic farmers for information on soil quality management were Extension services, followed by local organic certifying agencies, and state agriculture departments.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001
References
2.Black, J.D. 1950. The soils. In The Rural Economy of New England: A Regional Study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. p. 175–205.Google Scholar
3.Beste, A. 1998. An Applicable Field Method for the Evaluation of Ecological Soil Vitality in Science and Agricultural Consulting Practice. Foundation for Ecology and Agriculture, Bad Durkheim, Germany.Google Scholar
4.Brady, N.C. 1990. Soil formation, classification, and survey. In The Nature and Property of Soils. 10th ed.Macmillan, New York. p. 47–90.Google Scholar
5.Diver, S. 1998. Alternative Soil Testing Laboratories: Agronomy Resource List. Appropriate Technology Transfer for Rural Areas, Fayetteville, AR. Web site http://www.ATTRA.org/pub/soillaboratory.html (viewed October 1998).Google Scholar
7.Hampl, U. 1996. Soil examination in the field by spade sample diagnosis as a precondition for ecological soil management. In T.V. Ostergaard (ed.). Fundamentals of Organic Agriculture: Proceedings Volume 1 of the 11th IFOAM International Scientific Conference, August 11–15, 1996, Copenhagen. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements, Tholey-Theley, Germany.Google Scholar
8.Howell, J. 1997. Soil Basics: Part II, Chemical Properties of the Soil. University of Massachusetts Extension Vegetable and Small Fruit Program, Amherst.Google Scholar
9.Howell, J. 1997–1998. Soil Basics. Parts I through V. University of Massachusetts Extension Vegetable and Small Fruit Program, Amherst.Google Scholar
10.Koch, R., Drinkwater, L.E., and Buyer, J.S.. 1997. A simple method for assessing substrate utilization potential. Agronomy Abstracts. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. p. 222.Google Scholar
11.Liebig, M.A., and Doran, J.W.. 1999. Evaluation of farmers' perceptions of soil quality indicators. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 14:11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Lockeretz, W. 1997. Diversity of personal and enterprise characteristics among organic growers in the northeastern United States. Biol. Agric. Hort. 14:13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.MOFGA. 1997. Organic Certification Standards. Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association, Augusta.Google Scholar
14.MOFGA. 1998. 1998 Certified Growers List. Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association, Augusta.Google Scholar
15.New Hampshire Dept. of Agriculture, Markets and Food. 1998a. New Hampshire Organic Certification Program: Production Standards. New Hampshire Dept. of Agriculture, Bureau of Markets, Concord.Google Scholar
16.New Hampshire Dept. of Agriculture, Markets and Food. 1998b. 1998 NHDAMF Certified Organic Producers. New Hampshire Dept. of Agriculture, Bureau of Markets, Concord.Google Scholar
17.NOFA CT. 1997. Organic Farm Certification Standards and Administrative Procedures. Northeast Organic Farming Association of Connecticut, Northford.Google Scholar
18.NOFA CT. 1998. 1998 NOFA/CT Certified Farm Directory. Northeast Organic Farming Association of Connecticut, Northford.Google Scholar
19.NOFA MA. 1997. The NOFA Massachusetts Organic Certification Program. Northeast Organic Farming Association of Massachusetts, Barre.Google Scholar
20.NOFA MA. 1998. 1998–1999 Organic Food Guide. Northeast Organic Farming Association of Massachusetts, Barre.Google Scholar
21.NOFA VT. 1998a. Certification Standards and Applicant Information. Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont, Richmond.Google Scholar
22.NOFA VT. 1998b. NOFA-Vermont's Green Mountain Organic Grower's Directory 1998: A Guide to Certified Organic Food Producers in Vermont. Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont, Richmond.Google Scholar
23.Rhode Island Division of Agriculture and Resource Marketing. 1997. Standards for Certification of Organically Grown Crops in Rhode Island 1997. Rhode Island Division of Agriculture and Resource Marketing, Providence.Google Scholar
24.Rhode Island Division of Agriculture and Resource Marketing. 1998. Rhode Island Certified Organic and Transitional Organic Farms. Rhode Island Division of Agriculture and Resource Marketing, Providence.Google Scholar
25.Sachs, P.D. 1993. Edaphos: Dynamics of a Natural Soil System. Edaphic Press, Newbury, VT.Google Scholar
26.Smith, M., and Members of the Northeast Organic Farming Association and Cooperative Extension (eds.). 1994. The Real Dirt: Farmers Tell about Organic and Low-input Practices in the Northeast. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education program, Northeast Region, Burlington, VT.Google Scholar
27.Stork, N.E., and Eggleton, P.. 1992. Invertebrates as determinates and indicators of soil quality. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 7:38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.USDA. 1996. Soil Quality Information Sheet: Indicators for Soil Quality Evaluation. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil Quality Institute, Ames, IA. Web site http://www.statlab…/SQI/sqiinfo.shtml (viewed October 1998).Google Scholar
29.USDA. 1998. Soil Quality Test Kit Guide. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil Quality Institute, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
30.USDA. 1999a. Average annual soil erosion by wind and water on cultivated cropland as a proportion of the tolerable rate (T), 1982. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC. Web site http://www.nhq.nres.usda.gov/land/meta/m2079.html (viewed January 1999).Google Scholar
31.USDA. 1999b. 1997 Census of Agriculture. Volume 1: National, State, and County Tables. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC. Web site http://www.nass.usda.gov/census/census97/volume1/vol1pubs.htm (verified September 2000).Google Scholar
32.Visser, S., and Parkinson, D.. 1992. Soil biological criteria as indicators of soil quality: Soil microorganisms. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 7:33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Werner, M., and Brown, M.. 1998. Onfarm measurements of soil health: Testing the Soil Quality Kit on California farms. Organic Farming Res. Foundation Info. Bull. 5 (Summer). Santa Cruz, CA. p. 5–7. Web site http://www.ofrf.org/news/soil health.html (verified September 2000).Google Scholar