Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:18:02.459Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sustainable agriculture: Policy options and prospects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Charles M. Benbrook
Charles M. Benbrook
Affiliation:
Executive Director, Board on Agriculture, National Research Council, 2101 Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20418.
Get access

Abstract

Complex policy issues and tradeoffs will arise in crafting the 1990 or 1991 Farm Bill. Efforts to advance progress toward sustainable agriculture production systems could arise in the farm bill's commodity, conservation, and research titles. Key definitional issues are highlighted here, as well as water quality issues and the impact of ongoing GATT negotiations in the context of increasing global demands on American agriculture.

Keywords

sustainable agricultureagricultural policywater qualitycropping systems
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 4 , Issue 3-4 , December 1989 , pp. 153 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Blackmer, A. M., Pattker, D., Cerrato, M. E., and Webb, J.. 1989. Correlations between soil nitrate concentrations in late spring and corn yields in Iowa. J. Prod. Agric. 2:103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.National Research Council Board on Agriculture. 1990. Technology and Agricultural Policy. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
3.National Research Council, Board on Agriculture, Committee on the Role of Alternative Farming Methods in Modern Production Agriculture. 1989. Alternative Agriculture. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
4.Fox, R. H., and Piekielek, W. K.. 1988. Fertilizer N equivalence of alfalfa, birdsfoot trefoil, and red clover for succeeding corn crops. J. Prod. Agric. 1:313–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Legg, T. D., Fletcher, J. J., and Easter, K. W.. 1989. Nitrogen budgets and economic efficiency: a case study in southeastern Minnesota. J. Prod. Agric. 2:110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Ruttan, V. W. (ed.). 1989. Biological and Physical Constraints on Crop and Animal Productivity: Report on a Dialogue. Staff Paper, Department of Agriculture, Forestry, and Home Economics, University of Minnesota, pp. 89–45.Google Scholar
7.Schepers, J. 1987. Central Platte Natural Resources District Newsletter, Grand Island, NE. Vol. 3, No. 6–87.Google Scholar