Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:04:10.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Performance evaluation and impact assessment of a small water-harvesting structure in the Shiwalik foothills of northern India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

H.S. Sur*
Affiliation:
Associate Director of Research, Punjab Agricultural University, Regional Research Station for the Kandi Area, Ballowal Sounkhri, P.O. Takarla, The Balachaur, District Nawanshehr, Punjab, India;
Anil Bhardwaj
Affiliation:
Scientist (Soil & Water Engineering), Punjab Agricultural University, Regional Research Station, Ropar, Punjab, India.
P.K. Jindal
Affiliation:
Senior Research Engineer, Punjab Agricultural University, Regional Research Station for the Kandi Area, Ballowal Sounkhri, P.O. Takarla, The Balachaur, District Nawanshehr, Punjab, India;
*
Corresponding author is H.S. Sur ([email protected]).
Get access

Abstract

Construction of small water-harvesting structures (WHS) across seasonal streams, in the vicinity of cultivated areas, has proved to be a viable technique of water harvesting in the Shiwalik foothills of northern India. This paper reports on the performance and impact of one such structure in this area. Sufficient rainwater was available for harvesting because 86 ± 5.4% of monsoon rainstorms were runoff producing, resulting in collection of 29 ± 5% of the total monsoon rainfall. Out of this harvested water around 62% was available for irrigation at the start of the Rabi season (i.e., the dry season starting around 1 November). With time the water losses from the WHS declined from 66% in the first year of construction (1985) to 18% in 1996, because of sealing of soil pores from siltation of the reservoir bed. The life of the WHS was estimated to be 65 years at the observed average siltation rate of 47 Mg/ha/year. After construction of the WHS, the area under cultivation increased from 17 ha to 20 ha and the cropping intensity by 170 to 200%. The Rabi crop yields were approximately doubled. Assured availability of water and fodder increased milk production by 103%. Additional annual income of Rs. 7,015 per year was generated through fish culture. A rise in the groundwater level and higher growth of vegetation around the WHS were also observed. On the basis of increased crop production alone, the WHS proved to be an economically viable venture resulting in a benefit:cost ratio of greater than one. Socioeconomic considerations in the management of the WHS were also studied and showed that community involvement was essential to the success of this project.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Anon. 1995. Annual Report. Regional Research Station for Kandi Area, Punjab Agricultural University, Ballowal Saunkhri, Punjab, India.Google Scholar
2.Grewal, S.S., Mittal, S.P., Agnihotri, Y., and Dubey, L.N.. 1989. Rainwater harvesting for management of agricultural droughts in the foothills of northern India. Agric. Water Manage. 6:309322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Jindal, P.K., Singh, R.P., and Singh, I.. 1990. Technical feasibility and economical viability of small irrigation dams in Kandi area of Punjab state—a case study. Paper presented at the international symposium, Water Erosion, Sedimentation and Resource Conservation, 9–13 October 1990. Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute, Dehradun, India.Google Scholar
4.Jindal, P.K., Rao, B.N., and Sur, H.S.. 1991. Performance evaluation of mini dams in the Kandi area of Punjab State—a case study. Paper presented at the symposium, Large versus Small Dams—Socio-Environmental and Techno-Economic Assessment, 2 December 1991, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
5.Punmia, B.C., and Pande, B.B.L.. 1977. Irrigation and Water Power Engineering. 4th ed.Standard Publishers Distributors, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
6.Sur, H.S. 1996. Ecological degradation of Shiwalik foothills and strategies for its rehabilitation. In Kansal, B.D., Dhaliwal, G.S., and Bajwa, M.S. (eds.). Agriculture and Environment. National Agricultural Technology Information Centre, Ludhiana, India, p. 117.Google Scholar
7.Sur, H.S., and Ghuman, B.S.. 1994. Soil management and rainwater conservation and use—alluvial soils under medium rainfall. Bull. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 16:5665.Google Scholar
8.Sur, H.S., Sharma, S.C., and Bhardwaj, A.. 1997. Salient research findings in on-farm applied research. Integrated Watershed Development Project (Hills), Regional Research Station for Kandi Area. Punjab Agricultural University, Ballowal Saunkhri, Nawanshahr, Punjab, India.Google Scholar
9.Sur, H.S., Bhardwaj, A., and Jindal, P.K.. 1999. Some hydrological parameters for the design and operation of small earthen dams in lower Shiwaliks of Northern India. Agric. Water Manage. 1479:111121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Varshney, R.S. 1986. Engineering Hydrology. 3rd ed.Nem Chand and Bros., Roorkee, India.Google Scholar