Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:20:17.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Information dissemination in alternative agriculture research: An analysis of researchers in the North Central region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

K.L. Larson  and
L.A. Duram
K.L. Larson*
Affiliation:
Ph.D. Student and Research Assistant, Department of Geosciences-Geography Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-5506;
L.A. Duram
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901-4514.
*
Corresponding author is K.L. Larson ([email protected]).
Get access

Abstract

Agricultural research and education significantly influence the direction of U.S. agriculture by improving the practices available to farmers and by decreasing uncertainties associated with adopting new farming practices. Because sustainable agriculture is management-intensive, access to information is particularly important in adopting and implementing sustainable farming practices. Given that relatively little funding is allocated to sustainable agriculture research by the federal government, successful dissemination of these research results is critical. This paper presents an analysis of the dissemination efforts of 42 researchers funded through the USDA's North Central Region Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) program. Results show that these SARE researchers purposefully consider the effectiveness of various dissemination methods in reaching targeted audiences and attempt to involve farmers in their dissemination efforts. Overall, researchers note that information dissemination is limited by farmer interest. Additional barriers exist, most notably insufficient resources and institutional biases. In the future, the ways in which information is compiled and made available must be improved, and responsibility for farmer outreach should be better coordinated.

Keywords

Cooperative Extension Serviceland-grant universitiessustainable agricultureUSDA agricultural research
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 2000 , pp. 171 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Allen, P., Van Dusen, D., Lundy, J., and Gliessman, S.. 1991. Integrating social, environmental, and economic issues in sustainable agriculture. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 6:34–39.Google Scholar
2.Anderson, M.D. 1995. The life cycle of alternative agricultural research. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 10:3–9.Google Scholar
3.Auburn, J.S., and Baker, B.P.. 1992. Reintegrating agricultural research. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 7:105–110.Google Scholar
4.Batie, S.S., and Swinton, S.M.. 1994. Institutional issues and strategies for sustainable agriculture: View from within the land-grant university. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 9:23–27.Google Scholar
5.Batie, S.S., and Taylor, D.B.. 1989. Widespread adoption of non-conventional agriculture: Profitability and impacts. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 4:128–134.Google Scholar
6.Batie, S.S., and Taylor, D.B.. 1991. Assessing the character of agricultural production systems: Issues and implications. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 6:184–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Bezdicek, D.F., and DePhelps, C.. 1994. Innovative approaches for integrated research and educational programs. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 9:3–8.Google Scholar
8.Bultena, G.L., and Hoiberg, E.O.. 1986. Sources of information and technical assistance for farmers in controlling soil erosion. In Lovejoy, S.B. and Napier, T.L. (eds.). Conserving Soil: Insights from Socioeconomic Research. Soil Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA. p. 71–82.Google Scholar
9.Dillman, D.A. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
10.Duram, L.A. 1998. Taking a pragmatic behavioral approach to alternative agriculture research. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 13:90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Francis, C.A., King, J.W., Nelson, D.W., and Lucas, L.E.. 1988. Research and extension agenda for sustainable agriculture. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 3:123–126.Google Scholar
12.Gabriel, C.J. 1995. Research in support of sustainable agriculture. Bioscience 45:346–351.Google Scholar
13.Hassebrook, C., Bird, E.A.R., Johnson, B., Kroese, R., and Stauber, K.N.. 1995. Policy issues and recommendations. In Bird, E.A.R., Bultena, G.L., and Gardner, J.C. (eds.). Planting the Future: Developing an Agriculture that Sustains Land and Community. Iowa State University Press, Ames. p. 233–253.Google Scholar
14.Hassebrook, C., and Kroese, R.. 1990. Policy proposals to foster sustainable agriculture. J. Soil Water Conserv. 45:24–27.Google Scholar
15.Hoiberg, E.O., and Bultena, G.L.. 1995. Adoption of sustainable agriculture. In Bird, E.A.R., Bultena, G.L., and Gardner, J.C. (eds.). Planting the Future: Developing an Agriculture that Sustains Land and Community. Iowa State University Press, Ames. p. 155–171.Google Scholar
16.Keeney, D.R. 1989. Towards a sustainable agriculture: Need for clarification of concepts and terminology. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 4:101–105.Google Scholar
17.Kirschenmann, F. 1989. Low-input farming in practice: Putting a system together and making it work. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 4:106–110.Google Scholar
18.Korsching, P.F., and Hoban, T.J.. 1990. Relationships between information sources and farmers' conservation perceptions and behavior. Society Natl. Resour. 3(1):1–10.Google Scholar
19.Kraft, S.E., McIntosh, W.A., and Michalson, E.. 1986. Information needs and dissemination. In Lovejoy, S.B. and Napier, T.L. (eds.). Conserving Soil: Insights from Socioeconomic Research. Soil Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA. p. 143–146.Google Scholar
20.Lockeretz, W. 1988. Open questions in sustainable agriculture. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 3:174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Madden, J.P., and Dobbs, T.L.. 1990. The role of economics in achieving low-input farming systems. In Edwards, C. A., Lal, R., Madden, P., Miller, R.H., and House, G. (eds.). Sustainable Agricultural Systems. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA. p. 459–477.Google Scholar
22.Northwest Area Foundation. 1994. A Better Row to Hoe: The Economic, Environmental, and Social Impact of Sustainable Agriculture. St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
23.Nowak, P.J. 1987. The adoption of agricultural conservation technologies: Economic and diffusion explanations. Rural Sociol. 52:208–220.Google Scholar
24.NRC (National Research Council). 1989. Alternative Agriculture. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
25.OFRF. 1996. Executive Summary. 1995 National Organic Farmers' Survey Results. Organic Farming Research Foundation, Santa Cruz, CA. Web site http://www.ofrflorg/survey/1995.html (verified July 2000).Google Scholar
26.Parr, J.F., Papendick, R.I., Youngberg, I.G., and Meyer, R.E.. 1990. Sustainable agriculture in the United States. In Edwards, C.A., Lal, R., Madden, P., Miller, R.H., and House, G. (eds.). Sustainable Agricultural Systems. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA. p. 50–67.Google Scholar
27.Phillips, M.J. 1997. Land grant colleges of the future: Recommendations of the National Research Council. Choices 12(2):4–7.Google Scholar
28.Roberts, R.S., and Lighthall, D.R.. 1991. The political economy of agriculture, ground water quality management, and agricultural research. Water Resour. Bull. 27:437–446.Google Scholar
29.Rogers, E.M. 1962. Diffusion of Innovations. 3rd ed.Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
30.Rosmann, R.L. 1994. Farmer initiated onfarm research. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 9:34–37.Google Scholar
31.Ryan, B., and Gross, N.C.. 1943. The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociol. 8:15–24.Google Scholar
32.Saltiel, J., Bauder, J.W., and Palakvovich, S.. 1994. Adoption of sustainable agricultural practices: Diffusion, farm structure, and profitability. Rural Sociol. 59:333–349.Google Scholar
33.SARE. 1999. Search the SARE database of projects. SARE Home Page. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education program, Washington, DC. Web site http://www.sare.org/san/projects/search.html (verified July 2000).Google Scholar
34.Schaller, N. 1990. Mainstreaming low-input agriculture. J. Soil Water Conserv. 45:9–12.Google Scholar
35.Smith, K.R., 1995. Making alternative agriculture research policy. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 10:10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Stinner, B.R., and House, G.J.. 1987. Role of ecology in lower-input, sustainable agriculture: An introduction. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 2:146–147.Google Scholar
37.Thornley, K. 1990. Involving farmers in agricultural research: A farmer's perspective. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 5:174–177.Google Scholar
38.U.S. Congress. 1985. The Food Security Act and Agricultural Productivity Act of 1985. Public Law 99–198. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
39.U.S. Congress. 1990. Food, Agriculture, Conservation and Trade Act of 1990. Public Law 101–624. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DC. p. 3705–3706.Google Scholar
40.USDA. 1998. Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program, Research and Education Grant Program: 1998 Invitation for Proposals. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
41.Walter, G., Wander, M., and Bollero, G.. 1997. A farmer-centered approach to developing information for soil resource management: The Illinois Soil Quality Initiative. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 12:64–72.Google Scholar
42.Watkins, G. 1990. Participatory research: A farmer's perspective. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 5:161–162.Google Scholar