Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:07:07.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Case studies of integrated/whole farm system designs: Field-scale replicated IPM trials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Frank L. Young ,
Alex G. Ogg Jr  and
Robert I. Papendick
Frank L. Young
Affiliation:
Research Agronomist, USDA-ARS, Room 165, Johnson Hall, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164.
Alex G. Ogg Jr
Affiliation:
Plant Physiologist, USDA-ARS, Room 165, Johnson Hall, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164.
Robert I. Papendick
Affiliation:
Soil Physicist, USDA-ARS, Room 165, Johnson Hall, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164.
Get access

Abstract

A 6-yr interdisciplinary field project using large plots was initiated in 1985 to assist Pacific Northwest growers in developing an integrated pest management system to control weeds, reduce erosion and grow crops profitably. Run by a network of 10 to 14 scientists from eight disciplines supported by five agencies, the project showed that wellmanaged conservation tillage systems had a higher average profit and lower economic risk than traditional conventionally tilled systems. Information was disseminated successfully to user groups by field days, plot tours and an educational video. Organizational strategies included an interdisciplinary design with three levels of objectives. Cooperating scientists were invited to participate in writing the proposal and followed strict field protocols and attended mandatory organizational meetings. This long-term study used large machinery, went beyond the transitional stage and allowed treatments to mature. Limitations included the restricted number of experimental variables, the location of the plots, the large labor force required, and publication decisions.

Keywords

crop rotationeconomicsintegrated pest managementinterdisciplinarylong-term researchsystems researchtillage systemsweed management
Type
Selected Papers from the Conference on Science and Sustainability, Seattle, Washington, October 24–26, 1993
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 9 , Issue 1-2 , June 1994 , pp. 52 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Boerboom, C M., and Young, F.L.. 1991. Introduction. In Boerboom, C M. and Burns, J. (eds). Integrated Crop Management for Cereal/Legume Production in the Palouse. Technical Report 91–3. Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State Univ., Pullman, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
2.Boerboom, C M., Francis, J., and Veseth, R.. 1992. Profitable conservation cropping systems: Insights from the USDA-ARS IPM Project. Cooperative Extension video VT0029. Washington State Univ., Pullman.Google Scholar
3.Cook, R.J., and Veseth, R.J.. 1991. Wheat Health Management. APS Press, St. Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
4.Frazier, B.E., McCool, D.K., and Engle, C.F.. 1983. Soil erosion in the Palouse: An aerial perspective. J. Soil and Water Conservation 38:70–74.Google Scholar
5.Frye, W.W., and Thomas, G.W.. 1991. Management of long-term field experiments. Agronomy J. 83:38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Goldstein, W.A. 1986. Alternative crops, rotations, and management systems for the Palouse. Ph.D. dissertation. Dept. of Agronomy and Soils, Washington State Univ., Pullman.Google Scholar
7.Goldstein, W.A., and Young, D.L.. 1987. An agronomic and economic comparison of a conventional and a low-input cropping system in the Palouse. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 2:51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Hildebrand, P.E. 1990 Agronomy's role in sustainable agriculture: Integrated farming systems. J. Production Agric. 3:285–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Michalson, E.L., and Papendick, R.I.. 1991. STEEP - A regional model for environmental research and education. J. Soil and Water Conservation 46:245–250.Google Scholar
10.Papendick, R.I., McCool, D.K., and Krauss, H.A.. 1983. Soil conservation: Pacific Northwest. Dryland Agriculture. Agronomy Monograph 23. Amer. Soc. Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin. pp. 273–290.Google Scholar
11.Papendick, R.I., Michalson, E.L., and Warkintin, B.P.. 1991. STEEP: A model for systems research and education on regional problems. In Agronomy Abstracts. Amer. Soc. Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin. p. 80.Google Scholar
12.Reganold, J.P., Elliott, L.F., and Unger, Y.L.. 1987. Long-term effects of organic and conventional farming on soil erosion. Nature 330:370–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. 1978. Palouse Cooperative River Basin Study. (797–658). U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
14.Young, D.L., Kwon, T.J., and Young, F.L.. (in press). Profit and risk for integrated conservation farming systems in the Palouse. J. Soil and Water Conservation.Google Scholar
15.Young, F.L., Ogg, A.G. Jr., Boerboom, C.M., Alldredge, J.R., and Papendick, R.I.. (in press). Integration of weed management and tillage practices in spring dry pea production. Agronomy J.Google Scholar
16.Young, F.L., Ogg, A.G. Jr., Papendick, R.I., Thill, D.C., and Alldredge, J.R.. 1994. Tillage and weed management affects winter wheat yield in an integrated pest management system. Agronomy J. 86:147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar