Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:32:53.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Barriers to low-input agriculture adoption: A case study of Richmond County, Virginia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Penelope L. Diebel
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-4011;
Daniel B. Taylor
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0401;
Sandra S. Batie
Affiliation:
Elton R. Smith Professor of Food and Agricultural Policy, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824–1039.
Get access

Abstract

We coupled a nonlinear mathematical programming model with sensitivity analysis and evaluated some economic barriers to adoption of low-input agriculture by farmers in Richmond County, Virginia. Collection of primary data made the model more realistic. We analyzed potential barriers to adoption, including poultry litter price, yields, labor requirements, and variable input costs. We found the adoption of low-input practices to be sensitive to the price of poultry litter and relatively insensitive to yields, labor requirements, and variable costs. However, when several of these barriers are combined, the model predicts that farmers would use conventional practices. Therefore analysis of the farm as a system rather than practice by practice is important when identifying the effects of economic barriers.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Barry, P.J. 1980. Capital asset pricing and farm real estate. Amer. J. Agric. Economics 62(3):549553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Bartholomew, W.V. 1965. Mineralization and immobilization of nitrogen in the decomposition of plant and animal residues. In Bartholomew, W.V. and Clark, F.E. (eds). Soil Nitrogen. Agronomy Monograph 10. Amer. Soc. Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 285302.Google Scholar
3.Berardi, G.M. 1978. Organic and conventional wheat production: Examination of energy and economics. Agro-Ecosystems 4:367376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Brooke, A., Kendrick, D., and Meeraus, A.. 1988. GAMS: A User's Guide. The Scientific Press, Redwood City, California.Google Scholar
5.Buttel, F.H., Gillespie, G.W. Jr., Janke, R., Caldwell, B., and Sarrantonio, M.. 1986. Reduced-input agricultural systems: Rationale and prospects. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 1:5864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Dabbert, S., and Madden, P.. 1986. The transition to organic agriculture: A multi-year simulation model of a Pennsylvania farm. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 1:99107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Daberkow, S.G., and Reichelderfer, K.H.. 1988. Low-input agriculture: Trends, goals, and prospects for input use. Amer. J. Agric. Economics 70:11591166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Diebel, P.L. 1990. An economic analysis of low-input agriculture as a groundwater protection strategy. Ph.D. dissertation. Dept. of Agric. Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg.Google Scholar
9.Diebel, P.L., Taylor, D.B., Batie, S.S., and Heatwole, C.D.. 1992. Tradeoffs between water quality and the economic impacts of low-input agriculture in the Coastal Plain of Virginia. Staff Paper 92–12. Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan.Google Scholar
10.Doran, J.W., Fraser, D.G., Culik, M.N., and Liebhardt, W.C.. 1987. Influence of alternative and conventional agricultural management on soil microbial processes and nitrogen availability. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 2(3):99107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Fleming, M.H. 1987. Agricultural chemicals in ground water: Preventing contamination by removing barriers against low-input farm management. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 2(3): 124157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Frye, W.W., and Blevins, R.L.. 1989. Economically sustainable crop production with legume cover crops and conservation tillage. J. Soil and Water Conservation 44:5760.Google Scholar
13.Gilbertson, C.B. 1979. Animal waste utilization on cropland and pastureland: A manual for evaluating agronomic and environmental effects. EPA600-2-79-059. Environmental Protection Technology Series. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
14.Giuranna, A., Dietz, B., Ross, M., Taylor, D.B., and Batie, S.S.. 1991. Characteristics of farming in Richmond County, Virginia. Unpublished paper. Dept. of Agric. Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg.Google Scholar
15.Harwood, R.R. 1984. Organic farming research at the Rodale Research Center. In Bezdicek, D.F. and Power, J.F. (eds). Organic Farming: Current Technology and Its Role in a Sustainable Agriculture. Amer. Soc. Agronomy, Crop Sci. Soc. Amer., and Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 117.Google Scholar
16.Hwang, S.W. 1990. Low-input agriculture as a ground water protection strategy in Richmond County, Virginia. Unpublished paper. Department of Agricultural Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg.Google Scholar
17.Lockeretz, W., Shearer, G., Kohl, D.H., and Klepper, R.W.. 1984. Comparison of organic and conventional farming in the corn belt. In Bezdicek, D.F. and Power, J.F. (eds). Organic Farming: Current Technology and Its Role in a Sustainable Agriculture. Amer. Soc. Agronomy, Crop Sci. Soc. Amer., and Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 3748.Google Scholar
18.Madden, P. 1988. Low-input/sustainable agriculture—challenges to the agricultural economics profession. Amer. J. Agric. Economics 70:11671172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Murtagh, B.A., and Saunders, M.M.. 1987. MINOS 5.1 User's Guide. Report SOL-83-20R. Dept. of Operations Research, Stanford Univ., Stanford, California.Google Scholar
20.Napit, K.B. 1990. The economic potential of establishing a poultry litter handling industry. Ph.D. dissertation. Dept. of Agric. Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg.Google Scholar
21.Norris, P.E. 1988. A case study of investment in agricultural sustainability: Adoption and policy issues for nitrogen pollution control in the Chesapeake Bay drainage. Ph.D. dissertation. Dept. of Agric. Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg.Google Scholar
22.Perkinson, H.R. 1989. 1989 northern Virginia crop budgets. Virginia Cooperative Extension Service, Blacksburg.Google Scholar
23.Pieters, A.J., and McKee, R.. 1938. The use of cover and green-manure crops. In Soils and Men: The Yearbook of Agriculture. U.S. Dept. of Agric., Washington, D.C. pp. 431444.Google Scholar
24.Power, J.F. 1987a. Legumes: Their potential role in agricultural production. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 2(2):6973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Power, J.F. (ed.) 1987b. The Role of Legumes in Conservation Tillage Systems. Soil Conservation Soc. Amer., Ankeny, Iowa.Google Scholar
26.Randall, A. 1987. Resource Economics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
27.Taylor, D.B. 1989. Barriers to the adoption of low-input, sustainable agriculture. Presented at the Third Annual Virginia Conference on Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Charlottesville, March 13–14.Google Scholar
28.U.S. Dept. of Commerce. 1989. 1987 Census of Agriculture. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
29.Williams, J.L., and Wicks, G.H.. 1978. Weed control problems associated with crop residue systems. In Oschwald, W.R. (ed). Crop Residue Management Systems. Amer. Soc. Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 165172.Google Scholar
30.Young, D.L., and Goldstein, W.A.. 1988. How government farm programs discourage sustainable cropping systems. In Proceedings of Farming Systems Research Symposium. Fayetteville, Arkansas, pp. 443459.Google Scholar