Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:20:52.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Agronomic and economic potential of sustainable agriculture in South India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Erik van der Werf
Affiliation:
A consultant in sustainable agriculture, ETC-Foundation, PO Box 64, 3830 AB Leusden, the Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

The development of sustainable agriculture in India has been limited by the absence of data on the agricultural and economic viability of ecological agriculture and its longterm prospects. This paper describes a two-year study of seven farm pairs, each consisting of one ecological and one comparable conventional reference farm. The ecological farms differed significantly from the conventional farms in the number of crops grown, the dependence of crop activities on external nutrients, and the number of techniques used to maintain soil fertility and create plant diversity. No significant economic differences were found. Gross income, variable costs, gross margin and net cash income per hectare were in the same range for the two groups of farms. The two groups were similar in average yields for major crops, days of labor per hectare, and total returns per day of labor.

Type
Other Feature Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Howard, Albert. 1943. An Agricultural Testament. Oxford Univ. Press, New York and London.Google Scholar
2.Institute for Command Studies and Irrigation Management. 1990. A Report on Ecological Farming in South-India, An Economic Analysis. Bangalore, India.Google Scholar
3.Institute for Command Studies and Irrigation Management. 1991. A Report on Ecological Farming in South-India, An Economic Analysis. Bangalore, India.Google Scholar
4.Kirschenmann, F. 1992. Naar een alternatieve mythologie: Vijf-stappenplan. Vruchtbare Aarde, No. 5, pp. 49.Google Scholar
5.Lampkin, N. 1984. Problems of comparison in biological farming. New Farmer and Grower, No. 5, pp. 1720.Google Scholar
6.Lampkin, N. 1986. A research concept for investigating organic farming systems: Case studies. In Allen, P. and Van Dusen, D. (eds). Global Perspectives in Agroecology and Sustainable Agricultural Systems. Proc. Sixth Scientific Conf. of the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements. Agroecology Program, Univ. of California, Santa Cruz. pp. 121127.Google Scholar
7.Lockeretz, W., Shearer, G., Kohl, D.H., and Klepper, R.W.. 1984. Comparison of organic and conventional farming in the corn belt. In Bezdicek, D.F., and Power, J.F. (eds). Organic Farming: Current Technology and Its Role in a Sustainable Agriculture. Spec. Pub. 46. Amer. Soc. Agronomy, Crop Sci. Soc. Amer., and Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 3748.Google Scholar
8.Maxwell, S. 1984. The Role of Case Studies in Fanning Systems Research. Institute for Development Studies, Sussex, England.Google Scholar
9.Pushpalatha, A. 1992. Ecological Farming in South India, An Agricultural Comparison, 1990–1991. Agriculture, Man and Ecology, Pondicherry, IndiaGoogle Scholar
10.Sivasubramanian, K., and de Jonge, A.. 1990. Sustainability Analysis of Ecological Agriculture in South-India. Agriculture, Man and Ecology, Pondicherry, India.Google Scholar
11.Werf, E. van der, and de Jager, A.. 1992. Ecological Agriculture in South-India, An Agro-economic Comparison and Study of Transition. Agricultural Economics Research Institute, The Hague, and ETC-Foundation, Leusden, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
12.Werf, E. van der, Rao, G. Keshav, Pushpalatha, A., and Francis, Xavier A. 1992. An Agro-economic Comparison of Two Years of Research in Ecological and Conventional Agriculture in South-India. Agriculture, Man and Ecology, Pondicherry, India.Google Scholar