Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:00:55.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Riparian forest communities and their role in nutrient conservation in an agricultural watershed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Joseph L. Fail Jr
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Biology, Department of Natural Sciences, Shorter College, Rome, Georgia 30161.
Bruce L. Haines
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Botany, Department of Botany, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602.
Robert L. Todd
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota 57007.
Get access

Abstract

Riparian forests situated adjacent to agricultural uplands were studied to test the hypothesis that riparian forests intercept and utilize nutrients lost from these uplands. Production rates, tissue nutrient concentrations, and nutrient accretion rates of woody plants were compared between sites that were contiguous to agricultural areas (test sites) and sites that were separated from agricultural areas by grass buffer zones (reference sites). Net primary production was 10,344 kg ha–1yr–1, but trees within a riparian forest that received runoff directly from a pigpen (test site) had production rates that were 2.5 times higher than the average for all other sites. Above ground forest nutrient accretion rates were also highest at the pigpen test site. Woody plants in test site forests had, on the average, higher branch wood and leaf nutrient concentrations than plants in reference site forests. The data provide evidence that riparian forest communities within agricultural environments absorb and retain nutrients lost from agricultural uplands. As such they are important components of agricultural ecosystems helping to maintain acceptable stream water quality. It is suggested that ecologically sound agricultural practice should include longterm maintenance of natural riparian vegetation zones within agricultural areas.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Asmussen, L. E., Sheridan, J. M., and Booram, C. V. Jr., 1979. Nutrient movement in streamflow from agricultural watersheds in the Georgia coastal plain. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineering 22:809821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Aubertin, G. M., and Patric, J. H.. 1974. Water quality after clearcutting a small watershed in West Virginia. Journal of Environmental Quality 3:243249.Google Scholar
3.Auchmoody, L. R., and Filip, S. M.. 1973. Forest fertilization in the eastern United States: hardwoods. In Forest Fertilization Symposium Proceedings, Northeast Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, Pennsylvania. United States Forest Service General Technical Report NE-3. pp. 211225.Google Scholar
4.Batten, H. L. 1980. Little River research watersheds. United States Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publication 48.Google Scholar
5.Boyt, F. L., Bayley, S. E., and Zoltek, J. Jr., 1977. Removal of nutrients from treated municipal waste-water by wetland vegetation. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 49:789799.Google Scholar
6.Bremner, J. M., and Tabatabai, M. A.. 1980. Use of automated combustion techniques for total carbon, total nitrogen, and total sulfur analysis of soils. In Walsh, L. M. (ed.) Instrumental Methods for Analysis of Soils and Plant Tissue. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, p. 5.Google Scholar
7.Brinson, M. M., Bradshaw, H. D., and Kane, E. S.. 1984. Nutrient assimilative capacity of an alluvial floodplain swamp. Journal of Applied Ecology 21:10411057.Google Scholar
8.Brinson, M. M., Lugo, A. E., and Brown, S.. 1981. Primary productivity, decomposition, and consumer activity in freshwater wetlands. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12:123161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Blister, G. H., and Schultz, R. C.. 1981. The response of a southern Appalachian forest to waste water irrigation. Journal of Environmental Quality 10:2:148153.Google Scholar
10.Brown, S. 1981. A comparison of the structure, primary productivity, and transpiration of cypress ecosystems in Florida. Ecological Monographs 51:403427.Google Scholar
11.Brown, S., Brinson, M. M., and Lugo, A. E.. 1978. Structure and function of riparian wetlands. In Johnson, R. R. and McCormick, J. F. (eds.) Strategies for Protection and Management of Floodplain Wetlands and Other Riparian Ecosystems. Proceedings of the Symposium. Forest Service General Technical Report WO-12, Washington, DC. pp. 1731.Google Scholar
12.Brown, S., and Peterson, D. L.. 1983. Structural characteristics and biomass production of two Illinois bottomland forests. American Midland Naturalist 110:107117.Google Scholar
13.Caporali, F., Nannipieri, P., and Pedrazzini, F.. 1981. Nitrogen contents of streams draining an agricultural and a forested watershed in central Italy. Journal of Environmental Quality 10:7276.Google Scholar
14.Carlan, W. L., Perkins, H. F., and Leonard, R. A.. 1985. Movement of water in a plinthic paleudult using a bromide tracer. Soil Science 139:6266.Google Scholar
15.Chichester, F. W. 1976. The impact of fertilizer use and crop management on nitrogen content of subsurface water draining from upland agricultural watersheds. Journal of Environmental Quality 5:413416.Google Scholar
16.Commoner, B. 1968. Balance of nature. In Konkle, W. W. (ed.) Providing Quality Environment in our Communities. Graduate School Press, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
17.Conner, W. H., and Day, J. W. Jr., 1976. Productivity and composition of a bald cypress-water tupelo site and bottomland hardwood site in a Louisiana swamp. American Journal of Botany 63:13541364.Google Scholar
18.Cooley, J. H. 1982. Growing trees on effluent irrigation sites with sand soils in the upper midwest. In D'Itri, F. M. (ed.) Land Treatment of Municipal Wastewater: Vegetation Selection and Management. Ann Arbor Science Publications, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 155164.Google Scholar
19.Dabel, C. V., and Day, F. P.. 1977. Structural comparisons of four plant communities in the Great Dismal Swamp, Virginia. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 104:352360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Day, F. P. Jr., and Monk, C. D.. 1977. Seasonal nutrient dynamics in the vegetation on a southern Appalachian watershed. American Journal of Botany 64:11261139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Duvigneaud, P., and Denaeyer-DeSmet, S.. 1970. Biological cycling of minerals in temperate deciduous forests. In Reichle, D. E. (ed.) Ecological Studies I. Analysis of Temperate Forest Ecosystems, Springer-Verlag, New York, New York. pp. 199225.Google Scholar
22.Fail, J. L. Jr., 1983. Structure, biomass, production, and element accumulation in riparian forests of an agricultural watershed. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.Google Scholar
23.Finn, R. F. 1953. Foliar nitrogen and growth of certain mixed and pure forest plantings. Journal of Forestry 51:3133.Google Scholar
24.Finn, R. F., and Tryon, H. H.. 1942. The comparative influence of leaf mould and inorganic fertilizers on the growth of red oak. Black Rock Forest Paper 17:108109.Google Scholar
25.Finn, R. F., and White, D. P.. 1966. Commercial fertilizers increase growth in a yellow-poplar plantation. Journal of Forestry 64:809810.Google Scholar
26.Fisher, R. F., and Garbett, W. S.. 1980. Response of semi-mature slash and loblolly pine plantations to fertilization with nitrogen and phosphorus. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44:850854.Google Scholar
27.Gustin, G. M. 1960. A simple rapid automatic micro-Dumas apparatus for N determination. Microchemical Journal 4:4354.Google Scholar
28.Haines, B. L. 1978. Patterns of potassium, magnesium, and calcium uptake during southeastern oldfield succession. In D. C. Adriano and I. L. Brisbin, Jr. (eds.) Environmental Chemistry and Cycling Processes. DOE Symposium Series (CONF-760429). pp. 605621.Google Scholar
29.Harper, R. M. 1906. A phytogeographical sketch of the Altamaha Grit region of the coastal plain of Georgia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 17:1415.Google Scholar
30.Henderson, G. S. 1971. Nutrient concentrations in woody components of 16 tree species. Eastern Deciduous Forest Biome Memo Report 71–90. U.S. International Biological Program, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee.Google Scholar
31.Hendrickson, O. Q. Jr., 1981. Flux of N and C gases in bottomland soils of an agricultural watershed. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.Google Scholar
32.Herrick, B. R. 1981. Extractable soil pools of calcium, magnesium, potassium, and phosphorus in the riparian zone of an agricultural watershed. M.S. Thesis. University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.Google Scholar
33.Hirose, T., and Kuramoto, N.. 1981. Variability of stream water quality in some land management systems in the southern Kakioka Basin, Japan. Agroecosystems 7:4751.Google Scholar
34.Issac, R. A., and Kerber, J. D.. 1980. Atomic absorption and flame photometry: techniques and uses in soil, plant, and water analysis. In Walsh, L. M. (ed.) Instrumental Methods for Analysis of Soils and Plant Tissue. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
35.Jacobs, T. C., and Gilliam, J. W.. 1985. Riparian losses of nitrate from agricultural drainage waters. Journal of Environmental Quality 14:472478.Google Scholar
36.Johnson, F. L., and Bell, D. T.. 1976. Plant biomass and net primary production along a flood frequency gradient in the streamside forest. Castanea 41:156164.Google Scholar
37.Johnson, F. L., and Risser, P. G.. 1974. Biomass, annual net primary production, and dynamics of six mineral elements in a post oak-blackjack oak forest. Ecology 55:12461258.Google Scholar
38.Karr, J. R., and Schlosser, I. J.. 1978. Water resources and the land-water interface. Science 201:229234.Google Scholar
39.Loucks, O. L. 1977. Emergence of research on agroecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 8:173192.Google Scholar
40.Lowrance, R. R., Leonard, R. A., and Asmussen, L. E.. 1985. Nutrient budgets for agricultural watersheds in the southeastern coastal plain. Ecology 66:1:287296.Google Scholar
41.Lowrance, R. R., Todd, R. L., and Asmussen, L. E.. 1983. Waterborne nutrient budgets for the riparian zone of an agricultural watershed. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 10:371384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42.Lowrance, R. R., Todd, R. L., Fail, J. L. Jr., Hendrickson, O. Q. Jr., Leonard, R., and Asmussen, L.. 1984. Riparian forests as nutrient filters in agricultural watersheds. BioScience 34:6:374377.Google Scholar
43.McColl, R. H. S. 1978. Chemical runoff from pasture: the influence of fertilizer and riparian zones. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 12:4:371380.Google Scholar
44.McCreery, R. A. 1967. Notes on data for soils from Little River Watershed, Tift and Turner Counties, Georgia. Report to Southeast Watershed Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.Google Scholar
45.Nessel, J. K., Ewel, K. C., and Burrett, M. S.. 1982. Wastewater enrichment increases mature pond cypress growth rates. Forest Science 28:2:400403.Google Scholar
46.Nutter, W. L., Schultz, R. C., and Blister, G. H.. 1979. Renovation of municipal wastewater by spray irrigation on steep forest slopes in the southern Appalachians. In Sopper, W. W. and Kerr, S. N. (eds.) Utilization of Municipal Sewage Effluent and Sludge on Forest and Disturbed Lands. Penn State University Press, University Park, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
47.Odum, E. P. 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262270.Google Scholar
48.Odum, E. P. 1978. Ecological importance of the riparian zone. In R. R. Johnson and J. F. McCormick (eds.) Strategies for Protection and Management of Floodplain Wetlands and Other Riparian Ecosystems. Proceedings of the Symposium. Forest Service General Technical Report WO-12, Washington, DC. pp. 24.Google Scholar
49.Omernik, J. M., Abernathy, A. R., and Male, L. M.. 1981. Stream nutrient levels and proximity of agricultural and forest lands to streams: some relationships. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 36:4:227231.Google Scholar
50.Oosting, H. J. 1956. The study of plant communities. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, California. 440 pp.Google Scholar
51.Ovington, J. D. 1968. Some factors affecting nutrient distribution within ecosystems. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. Natural Resources Research 5:95105.Google Scholar
52.Penfound, W. T. 1952. Southern swamps and marshes. Botanical Review 18:413446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53.Peterjohn, W. T., and Correll, D. L.. 1984. Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed. Observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology 65:14661475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54.Phillips, E. A. 1959. Methods of vegetation study. Henry Holt and Company, New York, New York.Google Scholar
55.Radford, A. E., Ahles, H. E., and Bell, C. R.. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill, North Carolina.Google Scholar
56.Rawls, W. J., and Asmussen, L. E.. 1973. Subsurface flow in the Georgia coastal plain. Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers 99:375385.Google Scholar
57.Reiners, W. A. 1972. Structure and energetics of three Minnesota forests. Ecological Monographs 42:1:7193.Google Scholar
58.Reynolds, P. E., Carlson, K. G., Fromm, T. W., Gigliello, K. A., Kaminski, R. J., and Reynolds, M. K.. 1978. Phytosociology, biomass, productivity, and nutrient budget for the tree stratum of a New Jersey pine barren's hardwood swamp. Bulletin of the New Jersey Academy of Science 23:2.Google Scholar
59.Rochow, J. J. 1975. Mineral nutrient pool and cycling in a Missouri forest. Journal of Ecology 63:985994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60.Rolfe, G. L., Akhtar, M. A., and Arnold, L. E.. 1978. Nutrient distribution and flux in a mature oak-hickory forest. Forest Science 24:1:122130.Google Scholar
61.Schlesinger, W. H. 1978. Community structure, dynamics, and nutrient cycling in the Okefenokee cypress swamp-forest. Ecological Monographs 48:1:4365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
62.Schlosser, I. J., and Karr, J. R.. 1981. Water quality in agricultural watersheds: impact of riparian vegetation during base flow. Water Resources Bulletin 17:233240.Google Scholar
63.Smolen, M. D. 1981. Nutrient runoff from agricultural and non-agricultural watersheds. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 24:981987.Google Scholar
64.Vitousek, P. M., and Reiners, W. A.. 1975. Ecosystem succession and nutrient retention: A hypothesis. BioScience 25:376381.Google Scholar
65.Whittaker, R. H. 1966. Forest dimensions and production in the Great Smokey Mountains. Ecology 47:1:103121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66.Whittaker, R. H., Likens, G. E., Bormann, F. H., Eaton, J. S., and Siccama, T. G.. 1979. The Hubbard Brook ecosystem study: forest nutrient cycling and element behavior. Ecology 60:1:203220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
67.Whittaker, R. H., and Woodwell, G. M.. 1969. Structure, production, and diversity of the oak-pine forest at Brookhaven, New York. Journal of Ecology 57:157174.Google Scholar
68.Yates, P., and Sheridan, J. M.. 1983. Estimating the effectiveness of vegetated floodplains/wetlands as nitrate-nitrite and orthophosphorus filters. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 9:303314.Google Scholar