Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:36:42.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The economics of collecting chaff

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

M. R. Olfert ,
Mark Stumborg ,
Wayne Craig  and
R. A. Schoney
M. R. Olfert
Affiliation:
Lecturer, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, CanadaS7N 0W0;
Mark Stumborg
Affiliation:
Energy/ Design Engineer, Research Station, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, P.O. Box 1030, Swift Current, Saskatchewan, CanadaS9H 3X2;
Wayne Craig
Affiliation:
Manager of Rural Development Division, Saskatchewan Research Council, 15 Innovation Boulevard, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, CanadaS7N 2X8;
R. A. Schoney
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, CanadaS7N 0W0.
Get access

Abstract

Chaff, a by-product of cereal and oilseed production that is largely treated as waste product, may have significant economic value as a ruminant feed, and its collection and removal may reduce herbicide usage and tillage. We surveyed fifty farms located throughout the Brown, Dark Brown, and Black/Grey Wooded soil zones of Saskatchewan to determine the costs and benefits of their chaff collection systems. Benefits measured or estimated included both the feed value of chaff and agronomic benefits in the form of reduced tillage and herbicide requirements. Costs measured were for equipment and machinery ownership, maintenance and operation, including labor. The survey responses showed that, regardless of the type of collection system utilized, feed-related benefits outweighed the costs under the stated assumptions about prices and methods of assigning costs. Agronomic benefits alone also were sufficient to offset chaff collection costs. The net benefits of chaff collection are related to both the quantity of chaff collected and the distance the material is transported.

Keywords

chaff collectionchaff feedeconomics and chaffagronomic benefits of Chaff
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 154 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Campbell, C. A., Bowren, K., Lafond, G., Janzen, H., and Zentner, R. P.. 1989. Effect of crop rotations on soil organic matter in two black chernozems. Soils and Crops Workshop, February 16–17, 1989, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
2.Coxworth, E., Coates, W., Zuk, B., and Craig, W.. 1981. Crop Residue Densification: Technical and Economic Feasibility. SRC Publication No. C-711-10-B-81. Saskatchewan Research Council, Saskatoon.Google Scholar
3.Craig, W. 1988. Chaff collection costs and processing options. SRC Publication No. R-811-1-E-88. Saskatchewan Research Council, Saskatoon.Google Scholar
4.Knipfel, J. E. 1984. Beef cattle grazing and winter feed during drought. Agriculture Canada Weekly Letter No. 25, August 17. Agriculture Canada Research Station, Swift Current, Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
5.Rennie, D. 1986. You've gotta rock the boat if you're gonna make waves. Grainews, April 14. pp. 82–83.Google Scholar
6.Saskatchewan Department of Agriculture. 1983. Chaff collecting, hauling and packing costs. Farm Business Management Section, Saskatoon, June.Google Scholar
7.Saskatchewan Department of Agriculture. 1987. Potential of chaff. Farm Management Bulletin. Economics Branch, April.Google Scholar
8.Schoney, R. A. 1988. Results of the 1988 Saskatchewan Top Management Workshops. Bulletin FLB 88-01. Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.Google Scholar
9.Soil Conservation Notes. 1987. Tillage practices that reduce soil erosion. Save Our Soils ERDA Project. ISSN 0829-5751, Agdex 572, August.Google Scholar