Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:22:51.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The economic implications of organic farming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Terry Cacek  and
Linda L. Langner
Terry Cacek
Affiliation:
An agriculture specialist, Wildlife Management Division, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, 18th & C Streets, NW, Washington, DC 20240.
Linda L. Langner
Affiliation:
An agriculture economist, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1301 New York Avenue, Washington, DC 20005.
Get access

Abstract

Many farmers are turning to organic or “low input” farming as a strategy for economic survival. Several comparisons of actual grain farms in the central and northern states showed that organic farming equals or exceeds conventional farming in economic performance. These findings are supported by studies that used yield data from research plots as inputs to economic models. However, models that relied more heavily on hypothetical data showed an economic disadvantage for organic farming. This may have been a result of the failure of the hypothetical models to incorporate valid assumptions on conservation and efficient utilization of water, nutrients, fuel, labor, and capital. Established organic farmers are less vulnerable to natural and economic risks than conventional farmers because their systems are more diversified. They also are less able, however, to take advantage of income tax deductions. Future trends in commodity prices, input prices, pollution regulation, and research can be expected to have mixed effects on conventional and organic farmers, but the net impact will probably favor organic farmers. On a macroeconomic (i.e. national) scale, conversion to organic farming would have many benefits. It would reduce federal costs for supporting commodity prices, reduce depletion of fossil fuels, reduce the social costs associated with erosion, improve fish and wildlife habitats, and insure the productivity of the land for future generations. However, widespread conversion to organic farming would have an undesirable impact on the balance of trade. Future research on the economics of organic farming at the farm or microeconomics level should be directed at horticultural crops, southern latitudes, marketing, and the process of conversion from conventional to organic farming. Future macroeconomic research should quantify the social benefits described above, enabling decision makers to compare organic farming with other policy options.

Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , Winter 1986 , pp. 25 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Berardi, G. M. 1978. Organic and conventional wheat production: examination of energy and economics. Agro-Ecosystems 4:367–376.Google Scholar
2.Blobaum, Roger. 1983. Barriers to conversion to or ganic fanning practices in the midwestern United States. In: Environmentally Sound Agriculture, Lockeretz, William (ed.), pp. 263–278. Praeger, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
3.Brusko, Mike, DeVault, George, Zahradnik, Fred, Cramer, Craig, and Ayers, Lesa. 1985. Profitable farming now. The Regenerative Agriculture Association, Emmaus, Pa.Google Scholar
4.Buttel, Frederick H. and Youngberg, I. Garth. 1983. Implications of biotechnology for development of sustainable agricultural systems. In: Environmentally Sound Agriculture, Lockeretz, William (ed.), pp. 377–400. Praeger, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
5.Cacek, Terry. 1984. Organic farming: the other conservation farming system. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 39:357–360.Google Scholar
6.Clark, Edwin H. II, Haverkamp, Jennifer A., and Chapman, William. 1985. Eroding soils - the off-farm impacts. The Conservation Foundation, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
7.Crosson, Pierre. 1984. New perspectives on soil conservation policy. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 39:222–225.Google Scholar
8.Eberle, P and Holland, D.. 1979. Comparing organic and conventional grain farms in Washington. Tilth (Spring): 30–37.Google Scholar
9.Farris, Allen L. and Cole, Steven H.. 1981. Strategies and goals for wildlife habitat restoration on agricultural lands. Transactions of the Forty-sixth North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 46:130–136.Google Scholar
10.Helmers, Glenn A., Atwood, Joseph, and Langemeier, Michael R.. 1984. Economics of alternative crop rotations for east-central Nebraska—a preliminary analysis. Dept. of Agricultural Economics Staff Paper No. 14–1984. University of Nebraska, Lincoln.Google Scholar
11.James, Sidney C. 1983. Economic consequences of biological farming. In: Proceedings of the Management Alternatives for Biological Fanning Workshop, Dahlgren, Robert B., (ed.), pp. 17–26. Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, Iowa State University, Ames.Google Scholar
12.Judy, Robert D. Jr., Seeley, Paul N., Murray, Thomas M., Svirsky, Susan C., Whitworth, Molly R., and Ishinger, Lee S.. 1984. 1982 National Fisheries Survey. Vol I, Technical Report: Initial Findings. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C., FWS/OBS-84/06.Google Scholar
13.Kraten, S. L. 1979. A preliminary examination of the economic performance and energy intensiveness of organic and conventional small grain farms in the Northwest. M.S. Thesis. Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar
14.Lockeretz, William, Shearer, Georgia, Klepper, Robert, and Sweeney, Susan. 1978. Field crop production on organic farms in the Midwest. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 33:130–134.Google Scholar
15.Lowdermilk, W. C. 1975. Conquest of the land through 7,000 years. Agricultural Information Bulletin No. 99. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
16.Olson, Kent D., Heady, Earl O., and Langley, James A.. 1980. A national model of agricultural production, land use, export potential, and farm income under conventional and organic farming alternatives. Center for Agriculture and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Ames.Google Scholar
17.Patten, Andrea W.G. 1982. Comparison of nitrogen and phosphorus flows on an organic and chemical farm. M.S. Thesis. Department of Agronomy and Soils, Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar
18.Roberts, Kenneth J., Warnken, Philip F., and Schneeberger, Kenneth C.. 1979. The economics of organic crop production in the western Corn Belt. Agricultural Economics Paper No. 1979–6. University of Missouri, Columbia.Google Scholar
19.U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1980. Report and Recommendations on Organic Fanning. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
20.U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1984. Agricultural Statistics 1984. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar