Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:38:16.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Economic impacts of extended grazing systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

G. E. D'Souza
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, West Virginia University, Box 6108, Morgantown, WV 26506.
E. W. Maxwell
Affiliation:
Former Graduate Research Assistant, Division of Resource Management;, West Virginia University, Box 6108, Morgantown, WV 26506.
W. B. Bryan
Affiliation:
Professor, Division of Plant Sciences;, West Virginia University, Box 6108, Morgantown, WV 26506.
E. C. Prigge
Affiliation:
Professor, Division of Animal Sciences, West Virginia University, Box 6108, Morgantown, WV 26506.
Get access

Abstract

Extended grazing is a management system in which the usual grazing season is lengthened by utilization of hay fields for pasture. Extended grazing systems are a low-input alternative to conventional systems to the extent that they decrease the reliance on inputs such as machinery and energy to harvest forage. Substituting pasturing for harvested forage can therefore potentially decrease production costs and enhance the profitability of livestock production. However, the farm-level economic impacts of such a substitution are not well known. This analysis quantifies these impacts for beef cow/calf production. Specifying alternative meadow management systems for different grasses and using an economic-engineering approach, we have found that extended grazing can be a more profitable option for cow/calf production. Other findings suggest that, in an extended grazing system, the type of meadow, the hay baling method and the associated hay spoilage level also have important effects on production costs and profitability.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Baker, B. S., Lewis, P. E., Colyer, D. K., Woodson, F. E., Inskeep, K. E., and Maxwell, R. H.. 1981. 19701979 Allegheny Highlands project report. West Virginia Agric, and For. Exp. Stn., Morgantown, West Virginia, pp. 1014.Google Scholar
2.Baker, B. S., and Nestor, R. L.. 1979. Forage and weed species and grazing management systems on permanent pastures in the Allegheny Highlands of West Virginia. Bulletin 670. West Virginia Agric, and For. Exp. Stn., Morgantown, West Virginia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Baker, M. J., Prigge, E. C., and Bryan, W. B.. 1988. Herbage production from hay fields grazed by cattle in fall and spring. J. Prod. Agric. 1:273279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.D'Souza, G. E., Romero, R. F., and Smith, D. K.. 1988. The investment potential of warm-season grasses for hill-land beef producers. Northeastern J. Agric, and Res. Econ. 17:5663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Eagan, G. V. 1986. Custom machinery rates guide for 1986–87. Report FS 805. West Virginia Coop. Ext. Service, Morgantown, West Virginia, pp. 12.Google Scholar
6.Layton, R. A., Barr, A. L., and Nessel-road, P. E.. 1970. Estimated annual costs, production and income for selected livestock and crop enterprises. Eastern West Virginia. Bull. 594T. West Virginia Agric, and For. Exp. Stn., Morgantown, West Virginia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Maxwell, E. W. 1988. An economic analysis of alternative meadow management systems for West Virginia beef cow/calf producers. M.S. thesis. West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, West Virginia.Google Scholar
8.National Research Council. 1976. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 5th ed.National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
9.West Virginia Department of Agriculture. 1986. Agricultural Statistics. West Virginia Crop Rep. Serv., Charleston, West Virginia.Google Scholar
10.Wilman, D., and Griffiths, P. D.. 1978. The effect of winter and early spring grazing by sheep on subsequent sward production. J. Agric. Sci. 90:471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar