Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:35:13.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Caste, Class, and Counsel for the Poor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Jack Katz
Get access

Abstract

In modern society, poverty has been defined not only by quantitative measures of well-being but as a morally distinct category. In turn, the moral status of poverty has frequently been associated with primordial characteristics of race, ethnicity, national origin, or religion. In these moral and ascriptive respects, the social structure of poverty has been related systematically to the thrust of civil legal assistance on behalf of the poor.

Cyclically over the past century in the industrialized West, the poor have been organized into a social status with castelike features. In alternating historical periods, not only have the poor been culturally differentiated as an inherently different status group, their qualitative distinction has been institutionally constructed by practices of segregation legally sanctioned by the state. By noting the historically fluctuating phases in the construction of a modern caste of the poor, we may better understand the sociological significance of providing counseling to the poor on their civil legal problems. Modern law quite generally and civil legal assistance to the poor in some narrow but notable ways have significantly promoted the structuring of poverty into caste forms. And the caste status of poverty has shaped the role of lawyers for the poor in several important respects.

Type
Articles
Information
American Bar Foundation Research Journal , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , Spring 1985 , pp. 251 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1985 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For a review, see Peter Townsend, Poverty in the United Kingdom (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979).Google Scholar

2 A. B. Atkinson, The Economics of Inequality (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1975), discusses the evolution of the definition of poverty in the U.S. and Britain; see also Light, Donald, Income Distribution: The First Stage in the Consideration of Poverty, in M. Mankoff, ed., The Poverty of Progress (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972).Google Scholar

3 On moral deviance see Katz, Jack, Essences as Moral Identities, 80 Am. J. Soc. 1369 (1975). On welfare in the U.S. as a moral career see Beck, Bernard, Welfare as a Moral Career, 14 Soc. Probs. 258 (1967).Google Scholar

4 Hughes, Everett C., The Sociological Eye (Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, 1971).Google Scholar

5 Himrnelfarb, Gertrude, The Idea of Poverty (New York: Random House, Vintage Books, 1983).Google Scholar

6 The Methodists in particular had developed a religious vocabulary that denigrated the poor working class for being outside the bounds of grace. E. P. Thompson, The Making of the English Working Class 55, 58 (New York: Random House, Vintage Books, 1966).Google Scholar

7 Himmelfarb, supra note 5, at 41.Google Scholar

8 Cf. Paul Spicker, Stigma and Social Welfare 9 (London & Canberra: Croom Helm, 1984).Google Scholar

9 Kirsten Grónbjerg, David Street & Gerald Suttles, Poverty and Social Change 32 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968).Google Scholar

10 Monkkonen, Eric, The Dangerous Class: Crime and Poverty in Columbus Ohio, 1860–1885, at ISO (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

11 Copp, Terry, The Anatomy of Poverty (Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 1974).Google Scholar

12 Gareth Stedman Jones, Outcast London 1 (New York: Pantheon Books, 1984).Google Scholar

13 Mayhew, Henry, London Labour and the London Poor, 4 vols. (New York: Augustus M. Kelley, Publishers, 1967).Google Scholar

14 See Marcus, Steven, Engels, Manchester, and the Working Class 209, 210 (New York: Random House, Vintage Books, 1974).Google Scholar

15 See Spicker, , supra note 8, at 97 and passim, for evidence on the United Kingdom, France, Denmark, and Ireland. as well as Australia and Israel. Sweden is noted as the single exception.Google Scholar

16 E.g., William F. Whyte, Street Corner Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1943); Gerald D. Suttles, The Social Order of the Slum (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968).Google Scholar

17 As quoted in Himmelfarb, supra note 5, at 279.Google Scholar

18 Wright Mills, C., The Professional Ideology of Social Pathologists, 49 Am. J. Soc. 165 (1943).Google Scholar

19 Patterson, James T., America's Struggle Against Poverty, 1900–1980, at 134 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

20 Kramer, Jane, Unsettling Europe 83 (New York: Random House, Vintage Books, 1981).Google Scholar

21 New Soc'y, Apr. 14, 1983, at 63.Google Scholar

22 Kramer, supra note 20.Google Scholar

23 On poverty and caste notions in modern Europe see Spicker, supra note 8, at 167–69.Google Scholar

24 Patterson, supra note 19, at 53.Google Scholar

25 Elmar Hönekopp & Hans Ullman, The Status of Immigrant Workers in the Federal Republic of Germany, in Eric-Jean Thomas, ed., Immigrant Workers in Europe: Their Legal Status 130 (Vendome, France: UNESCO, 1982).Google Scholar

26 Stephen Castles & Godula Kosack, Immigrant Workers and Class Structure in Western Europe 86 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1973).Google Scholar

27 Miller, Mark, Reluctant Partnership: Foreign Workers in Franco-Algerian Relations, 1962–1979, 1979 J. Int'l Aff. 219, 229.Google Scholar

28 Groenendijk, Kees, The Working Group on Legal Aid for Immigrants, in Erhard Blankenburg, ed., Innovations in the Legal Services 165, 175 n.2 (Cambridge, Mass.: Oelgeschalger, Gunn & Hain, 1980).Google Scholar

29 Castles & Kosack, supra note 26, at 93.Google Scholar

30 Berger, Suzanne, Foreign Workers in Western Europe, 3 J. Inst. Socioeconomic Stud. 50 (1978). For statistics on specific immigrant groups in specific western European nations, see Thomas, supra note 25.Google Scholar

31 See Kramer, , supra note 20Google Scholar

32 On the more general question of the conditions under which societies develop commitments to provide legal assistance to the poor, see Abel, Richard L., Law Without Politics: Legal Aid Under Advanced Capitalism, 32 UCLA L. Rev. 474, 586–92 (1985).Google Scholar

33 Maguire, John, The Lance of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1928).Google Scholar

34 Kitchen, Martin, The Political Economy of Germany, 1815–1914, at 200–201 (Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

35 Dawson, William, The Evolution of Modern Germany 468–469 (London: T. Risher Unwine, 1978).Google Scholar

36 Moore, Barrington, Jr., Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt 236 (White Plains, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe, Inc., 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37 Katz, Jack, Poor People's Lawyers in Transition ch. 2 (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

38 Erhard Blankenburg & Udo Reifner, Conditions of Legal and Political Culture Limiting the Transferability of Access-to-Law Innovations, in Mauro Cappelletti, ed., Access to Justice and the Welfare State 217, 229 (Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff, 1981) (footnotes omitted).Google Scholar

39 Id. at 230.Google Scholar

40 Id. at 230, 231.Google Scholar

41 Gusfield, Joseph R., Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement 127 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1963).Google Scholar

42 See Johnson, Earl, Jr., Justice and Reform ch. 2 (New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 1974); Katz, supra note 37, at ch. 4.Google Scholar

43 See Cooper, Jeremy, Public Legal Services (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1983); Bryant Garth, Neighborhood Law Firms for the Poor (Rockville, Md.: Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1980).Google Scholar

44 Cooper, supra note 43, at 79, 100–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45 Id. at 82, 154.Google Scholar

46 Groenendijk, Kees, Litigation, Politics, and Publicity 7 (paper presented at the Conference on Public Interest Law, Middlesex Polytechnic Conference Centre, London, June 1984).Google Scholar

47 Groenendijk, supra note 28.Google Scholar

48 A. J. M. van Groenendael & A. H. M. van der Vaart, Buitenlanders en de Buro's Voor Rechtshulp 17 table 4 (Nijmegen: Instituut Voor Rechtssociologie, 1983).Google Scholar

49 Garth, supra note 43, at 125, 126.Google Scholar

50 Id. at 127.Google Scholar

51 Katz, supra note 37, at 146–48.Google Scholar

52 Id. at 45–49.Google Scholar

53 Blankenburg & Reifner, supra note 38, at 238.Google Scholar

54 Gosnell, Harold, Machine Politics: Chicago Model (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968).Google Scholar

55 Id. at 14.Google Scholar

56 Id. at 71–73.Google Scholar

57 Id. Google Scholar

58 Katz, supra note 37, at 38–40.Google Scholar

59 Shapiro, Martin, Access to the Legal System and the Welfare State, in Cappelletti, supra note 38, at 281.Google Scholar

60 As late as “the beginning of 1928 there was a fairly even balance between the two major parties in the city.” Gosnell, supra note 54, at 8.Google Scholar

61 Shapiro, supra note 59, at 290.Google Scholar

62 Daniel, Cletus, Bitter Harvest: A History of California Farmworkers, 1870–1941 (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

63 Katz, supra note 37, at 183–86.Google Scholar

64 See Miller, Mark J. & Martin, Phillip A., Administering Foreign Worker Programs (Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath & Co., Lexington Books, 1982).Google Scholar

65 Cooper, supra note 43, at 100–112.Google Scholar

66 See, e.g., Ward, Robin, Race Relations in Britain, 29 British J. Soc. 464 (1978); Economist, Oct. 7, 1978, at 25; New Statesman, Apr. 20, 1979, at 541–42.Google Scholar

67 Miller, supra note 27.Google Scholar

68 Id. at 185.Google Scholar

69 Id. at 186.Google Scholar

70 Id. at 157.Google Scholar

71 Himmelfarb, supra note 5, at 211.Google Scholar

72 Copp, supra note 11, at 110.Google Scholar

73 Richard Cloward & Francis Piven, A Strategy to End Poverty, Nation, May 2, 1966, at 510.Google Scholar

74 Handler, Joel F., Reforming the Poor 74–75 (New York: Basic Books, 1972).Google Scholar

75 See Califano, Joseph, Governing America ch. 3 (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1981).Google Scholar

76 See Moynihan, Daniel, The Politics of a Guaranteed Income: The Nixon Administration and the Family Assistance Plan (New York: Random House, 1973).Google Scholar

77 Katz, supra note 37, at ch. 10.Google Scholar

78 See Cover, Robert, Justice Accused: Antislavery and the Judicial Process (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

79 Jones, Marcus, Black Migration in the United States 38–40 (Saratoga, Cal.: Century 21 Publishing, 1980).Google Scholar

80 U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Series P-60, No. 144, Characteristics of the Population Below the Poverty Level: 1982, at table 4 on p. 16. (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1984).Google Scholar

81 Hirsch, Arnold, Making the Second Ghetto: Race and Housing in Chicago, 1940–1960, at 10 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

82 Bowly, Devereux, Jr., The Poorhouse: Subsidized Housing in Chicago, 1895–1976, at 54,221 (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

83 Hirsch, supra note 81, at 10.Google Scholar

84 Friedman, Lawrence, Government and Slum Housing (Chicago: Rand McNally & Co., 1968).Google Scholar

85 U.S. Bureau of the Census, supra note 80, at table 1 on pp. 7, 8.Google Scholar

86 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Characteristics of Food Stamp Households 17 table G (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1980). On the substantial increase between 1961 and 1971 in the proportion of blacks receiving AFDC benefits, see Sar Levitan, William Johnston, & Robert Taggart, Still a Dream (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

87 Steiner, Gilbert, Social Insecurity: The Politics of Welfare (Chicago: Rand McNally & Co., 1966).Google Scholar

88 Smolders, Chris, The Status of Immigrant Workers in the Netherlands, in Thomas, supra note 25, at 95.Google Scholar

89 Miller, Mark J., Foreign Workers in Western Europe: An Emerging Political Force 10 (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1981).Google Scholar

90 Hönekopp & Ullman, supra note 25, at 126–27.Google Scholar

91 Herman Debbaut & Johan Declerck, The Status of Immigrant Workers in Belgium, in Thomas, supra note 25, at 14.Google Scholar

92 Eric-Jean Thomas, The Status of Immigrant Workers in France, in Thomas, supra note 25, at 41, 62.Google Scholar

93 See Miller, Mark, The Political Impact of Foreign Labor: A Re-evaluation of the Western European Experience, 16 Int'l Migration Rev. 27, 28 (1981).Google Scholar

94 Hönekopp & Ullman, supra note 25, at 121, 135.Google Scholar

95 Blankenburg & Reifner, supra note 38, at 224–25.Google Scholar

96 See Miller & Martin, supra note 64.Google Scholar

97 Castles & Kosack, supra note 26, at 313.Google Scholar

98 Friedman, Lawrence M., Access to Justice: Social and Historical Context, in Mauro Cappelletti, ed., Access to Justice, bk. 1, vol. 2, Promising Institutions, ed. Mauro Cappelletti & John Weisner 3, 22 (Alphe aan den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff; Milan: Dott. A. Giuffrè Editore, 1978).Google Scholar

99 Blankenburg & Reifner, supra note 38, at 225.Google Scholar

100 Cooper, supra note 43, at 26.Google Scholar

101 Id. at 80.Google Scholar

102 Zander, Michael, The First Wave, in Cappelletti, supra note 38, at 27, 28; John A. Flood, Barristers' Clerks 131 (Manchester, Eng.: Manchester University Press, 1983) (“the junior Bar receives fifty per cent of its income from public funds”).Google Scholar

103 Blankenburg & Reifner, supra note 38, at 222.Google Scholar

104 Cooper, supra note 43, at 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

105 Patterson, supra note 19, at 165.Google Scholar

106 André Tunc, The Quest for Justice, in Cappelletti, supra note 38, at 317, 344–45 (footnotes omitted).Google Scholar

107 See Cashman, Peter, Public Interest Law and Legal Services (paper presented at Conference on Public Interest Law, Middlesex Polytechnic Conference Centre, London, June 1984).Google Scholar

108 Rose, Hilary, Up Against the Welfare State: The Claimants Unions, 1973 Socialist Reg. 179.Google Scholar

109 Jack Roach & Janet Roach, Mobilizing the Poor: Road to a Dead End, 26 Soc. Probs. 160 (1978).Google Scholar

110 On the balkanization of the San Francisco Legal Services program, see Jerome Carlin, Store Front Lawyers in San Francisco, in Howard S. Becker, ed., Culture and Civility in San Francisco (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1971)Google Scholar

111 Tamara Hareven & Randolph Langenbach, Amoskeag: Life and Work in an American Factory City (New York: Pantheon Books, 1978).Google Scholar

112 Moore, Barrington, Jr., Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (Boston: Beacon Press, 1966).Google Scholar

113 For a recent, positive review of the evidence, see Christopher Jencks, How Poor Are the Poor? 32 N.Y. Rev. Books 41 (1985).Google Scholar

114 Cf. Joel F. Handler, Social Movements and the Legal System 156–62 (New York: Academic Press, 1978).Google Scholar