Article contents
The Attorney General's Commission on Pornography: The Gaps Between “Findings” and Facts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
Extract
The Attorney General's Commission on Pornography was asked by the president of the United States to “review the available empirical evidence on the relationship between exposure to pornographic materials and antisocial behavior [and to explore] possible roles and initiatives that the Department of Justice and agencies of local, State, and federal government could pursue in controlling, consistent with constitutional guarantees, the production and distribution of pornography” (at 216). The Commission undertook this review during several public meetings held across the country in 1986 and, as a result of the review, concluded that there is a causal relationship between exposure to many forms of pornography and several harmful effects including increased levels of violence against women. The Commission called for stricter enforcement of existing obscenity laws and serious consideration of additional legal measures. These measures include amending the federal obscenity laws to prohibit the transmission of obscene material through the telephone and eliminating the “utterly without redeeming value” clause found in some state obscenity statutes. In all, the Commission made 92 recommendations involving changes in existing federal, state, and local obscenity laws. Without exception, the recommendations for legal changes call for greater restrictions on sexually explicit material and more stringent enforcement of current obscenity law.
- Type
- Symposium on the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography
- Information
- American Bar Foundation Research Journal , Volume 12 , Issue 4: Special Review Issue , Fall 1987 , pp. 713 - 736
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1987
References
1 Scott, J. E. & Cuvelier, S. J., An Updated Longitudinal Content Analysis of Sex References in Mass Circulation Magazines, J. Sex Research (in press).Google Scholar
2 Smith, D. D., Sexual Aggression in American Pornography: The Stereotype of Rape (paper presented at annual meeting of American Sociological Association, New York City, 1976); Id., The Social Content of Pornography, 26 J. Com. 16 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Malamuth, N. & Spinner, B., A Longitudinal Content Analysis of Sexual Violence in the Best-Selling Erotica Magazines, 16 J. Sex Research 226 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Scott, & Cuvelier, , J. Sex Research (in press).Google Scholar
5 See also Scott, J. E. & Cuvelier, S. J., Violence in Playboy Magazine: A Longitudinal Analysis, Arch. Sexual Behavior (in press).Google Scholar
6 Dietz, P. E. & Evans, B., Pornographic Imagery and Prevalence of Paraphilia, 139 Am. J. Psychiatry 1493–1495 (1982).Google ScholarPubMed
7 Slade, J., Violence in the Hard-core Pornography Film: An Historical Survey, 34 J. Com. 148 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Palys, T. S., Testing the Common Wisdom: The Social Content of Video Pornography, 27 Can. Psychol. 22 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 For a review of these findings see E. Donnerstein & D. Linz, Mass Media Sexual Violence and Male Viewers: Current Theory and Research, 29 Am. Behavioral Sci. 601 (1986); E. Donnerstein, D. Linz, & S. Penrod, The Question of Pornography: Research Findings and Policy Implications (New York: Free Press, 1987); D. Linz, E. Donnerstein, & S. Penrod, Sexual Violence in the Mass Media: Social Psychological Implications, in P. Shaver & C. Hendrick, eds., 7 Review of Personality and Social Psychology 135–175 (Newbury Park, Cal.: Sage Publications, 1987); and N. M. Malamuth & E. Donnerstein, The Effects of Aggressive-Pornographic Mass Media Stimuli, in L. Berkowitz, ed., 15 Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (New York: Academic Press, 1982); and N. M. Malamuth & E. Donnerstein, eds., Pornography and Sexual Aggression (New York: Academic Press, 1984).Google Scholar
10 Palys, 27 Can. Psychol. 22, supra note 8.Google Scholar
11 Malamuth, N. M. & Check, J. V. P., The Effects of Mass Media Exposure on Acceptance of Violence Against Women: A Field Experiment, 15 J. Research in Personality 436 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 E. Donnerstein, L. Berkowitz, & D. Linz, Role of Aggressive and Sexual Images in Violent Pornography (manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1986).Google Scholar
13 Donnerstein, E. & Berkowitz, L., Victim Reactions in Aggressive Erotic Films as a Factor in Violence Against Women, 41 J. Personality & Soc. Psych. 710 (1981).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 E.g., Malamuth, & Check, , 15 J. Research in Personality 436 (cited in note 11).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Linz, D., Donnerstein, E., & Penrod, S., The Effects of Multiple Exposures to Filmed Violence Against Women, 34 J. Comm. 130 (1984); D. Linz, Sexual Violence in the Media: Effects on Male Viewers and Implications for Society (doctoral diss., University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1985).Google Scholar
16 Freedman, J. L., Effect of Television Violence on Aggressiveness, Psychol. Bull. 227 (1984); Id., Television Violence and Aggression: A Rejoinder, 100 Psychol. Bull. 372 (1986); Fredrich-Cofer, L. & Huston, A. C., Television Violence and Aggression: The Debate Continues, 100 Psychol. Bull. 364 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Krattenmaker, T. G. & Powe, L. A. Jr., Televised Violence: First Amendment Principles and Social Science, 64 Va. L. Rev. 1123 (1978).Google Scholar
18 E. P. Mulvey & J. L. Haugaard, Report of the Surgeon General's Workshop on Pornography and Public Health (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Public Health Service, 1986).Google Scholar
19 Zillmann, D. & Bryant, J., Pornography, Sexual Callousness, and the Trivialization of Rape, 32 J. Com. 10 (1982).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 C. L. Krafka, Sexually Explicit, Sexually Violent, and Violent Media: Effects of Multiple Naturalistic Exposures and Debriefing on Female Viewers (doctoral diss., University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1985); D. Linz, Sexual Violence in the Media: Effects on Male Viewers and Implications for Society (doctoral diss., University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1985).Google Scholar
21 J. V. P. Check, The Effects of Violent and Nonviolent Pornography (Department of Supply and Services Contract No. 05SV 19200-3-0899) (Ottawa: Canadian Department of Justice, 1984) (hereinafter “Check, Effects of Pornography”).Google Scholar
22 Zillmann, & Bryant, , 32 J. Com. 10. supra note 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23 Check, Effects of Pornography, supra note 21.Google Scholar
24 Supra note 20.Google Scholar
25 Zillmann, & Bryant, , 32 J. Com. 10, supra note 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26 Malamuth, N. M., Predictors of Naturalistic Sexual Aggression, 50 J. Personality & Soc. Psychol. 953 (1986).Google ScholarPubMed
27 Id.Google Scholar
28 H. J. Eysenck & S. B. G. Eysenck, Psychoticism as a Dimension of Personality (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1976).Google Scholar
29 Koss, M. & Oros, C., Sexual Experiences Survey: A Research Instrument Investigating Aggression and Victimization, 50 J. Consulting & Clinical Psychol. 445 (1982).Google ScholarPubMed
30 For further discussion of these issues, see Malamuth, N. M. & Briere, J., Sexual Violence in the Media: Indirect Effects on Aggression Against Women, 42 J. Soc. Issues (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31 Zillmann, & Bryant, , 32 J. Com. 10, supra note 19.Google Scholar
32 D. Zillmann & J. Bryant, Effects of Massive Exposure to Pornography, in N. Malamuth & E. Donnerstein, eds., Pornography and Sexual Aggression (New York: Academic Press, 1984).Google Scholar
33 Deitz, P. E., Harry, B., & Hazelwood, R. R., Detective Magazines: Pornography for the Sexual Sadist 31 J. Forensic Sci. (JFSCA) 197 (1986).Google Scholar
34 E. P. Mulvey & J. L. Haugaard, Report of the Surgeon General's Workshop on Pornography and Public Health (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Public Health Service, 1986).Google Scholar
35 Indianapolis and Marion County, Ind., Ordinance 35, S2, 16–3(q) Proposal No. 298 (June 15, 1984).Google Scholar
36 Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973).Google Scholar
37 Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942).Google Scholar
38 New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 (1982).Google Scholar
39 American Booksellers Ass'n v. Hudnut, 598 F. Supp. 1316 (S.D. Ind. 1984), citing Freedman v. State of Maryland, 380 U.S. 51, 85 S. Ct. 734 (1965).Google Scholar
40 American Booksellers Ass'n v. Hudnut, 771 F.2d 323 (7th Cir. 1985).Google Scholar
41 American Booksellers Ass'n v. Hudnut, prob. jurs. 55 L.W. 3569 (Feb. 23, 1987).Google Scholar
42 Donnerstein, & Berkowitz, , 41 J. Personality & Soc. Psych. 710, supra note 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43 Malamuth, N. M. & Check, J. V. P., Debriefing Effectiveness Following Exposure to Pornographic Rape Depictions, 20 J. Sex Research (1984).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44 Check, J. V. P. & Malamuth, N. M., Can Participation in Pornography Experiments Have Positive Effects 20 J. Sex Research 14 (1984).Google ScholarPubMed
45 E. Donnerstein, S. Penrod. & D. Linz, Report to the Human Subjects Committee: Reply to the Committee's Letter of August 13, 1984 (manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1984).Google Scholar
46 D. Linz, Sexual Violence in the Media: Effects on Male Viewers and Implications for Society (doctoral diss., University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1985).Google Scholar
47 N. M. Malamuth, Aggression Against Women: Cultural and Individual Causes, in N. M. Malamuth & E. Donnerstein (eds.), Pornography and Sexual Aggression (Orlando, Fla.: Academic Press, 1984).Google Scholar
48 Flay, B. R., Psychosocial Approaches to Smoking Prevention: A Review of Findings, 4 Health Psych. 449 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49 P. B. Bart, L. Freeman, & P. Kimball, The Different Worlds of Women and Men: Attitudes Toward Pornography and Responses to Not a Love Story—A Film About Pornography (paper presented at Second International Interdisciplinary Conference on Women, Groningen, The Netherlands, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50 Malamuth, Aggression Against Women, supra note 47.Google Scholar
51 Zillmann, D., Weaver, J. B., Mundorf, N., & Aust, C. F., Effects of an Opposite-Gender Companion's Affect to Horror on Distress, Delight, and Attraction, 51 J. Personality & Soc. Psychol. 586 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10
- Cited by