Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T23:41:57.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trampling the Archaeological Record: An Experimental Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Axel E. Nielsen
Axel E. Nielsen*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Traditional Technology, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, and Cátedra de Prehistoria y Arqueología, Escuela de Historia, Universidad Nacional de Cordoba, Argentina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports on several experiments carried out to explore the transformations of the archaeological record affected by trampling. These transformations include changes in artifact distributions and formal alterations that should be taken into account when carrying out studies of activity areas. The experiments were made on dry, hard-packed surfaces and in the same sediments after a rain. The materials used were bones, obsidian flakes, sherds, and fragments of brick and wood. The analysis focuses on vertical displacement, horizontal displacement, and damage (breakage, microflaking, and abrasion), paying special attention to the response of the trodden substrate and its implications for the whole process. The interaction of trampling with other formation processes (e.g., maintenance) also is considered. The main patterns observed in the trampled materials are vertical and horizontal size sorting, and characteristic size distributions in sherds. These empirical generalizations are then integrated in a model that can help to identify trampled contexts and assess their potential for behavioral inference.

Résumé

Résumé

El presente artículo describe varios experiments realizados con el propósito de explorar las transformaciones producidas por pisoteo en el registro arqueológico. Tales transformaciones incluyen cambios en la distribución de artefactos y alteraciones formales que deben tenerse en cuenta al realizar estudios de áreas de actividad. Los experiments fueron efectuados sobre superficies muy compactas, secas y luego de una lluvia. Se utilizaron huesos, lascas de obsidiana, tiestos y fragmentos de ladrillo y madera. Los aspectos que se analizan son desplazamiento vertical, desplazamiento horizontal y daño (fractura, microlascado y abrasión), prestando especial atención a la respuesta del substrato pisoteado y sus implicancias para el proceso en su conjunto. También se considera la interacción del pisoteo con otros procesos de formación (p.e., mantenimiento). Los principales patrones observados en los materiales pisoteados incluyen ordenamiento vertical y horizontal por tamaño y distribuciones características en la dimensión de los tiestos. Estas generalizaciones empíricas son luego integradas en un modelo que puede contribuir a identificar contextos pisoteados, así como a evaluar su potencial para establecer inferencias de carácter conductual.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , July 1991 , pp. 483 - 503
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Behrensmeyer, A., Gordon, K., and Yanagi, G. 1986 Trampling as a Cause of Bone Surface Damage and Pseudo-cutmarks. Nature 319 : 768–771.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1978 Dimensional Analysis of Behavior and Site Structure : Learning from an Eskimo Hunting Stand. American Antiquity 43 : 330–361.Google Scholar
Black, C. A. (editor) 1965 Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1 : Physical and Mineralogical Properties, Including Statistics of Measurement and Sampling. American Society of Agronomy, Madison.Google Scholar
Bradford, J. 1986 Penetrability. In Methods of Soil A nalysis. Part 1 : Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd ed., edited by Klute, A., pp. 463–477. American Society of Agronomy, Madison.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., and Fulford, M. 1980 Sherd Size in the Analysis of Occupation Debris. Institute of Archaeology, University of London, Bulletin 17 : 85–94.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. 1977 Spatial Archaeology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Courtin, J., and Villa, P. 1982 Une experience de pietinement. Bulletin de la Societe Prihistorique Francaise 79 : 117–123.Google Scholar
DeBoer, W., and Lathrap, D. 1979 The Making and Breaking of Shipibo-Conibo Ceramics. In Ethnoarchaeology : Implications of Ethnography for Archaeology, edited by Kramer, C., pp. 103–138. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Flenniken, J., and Haggerty, J. 1979 Trampling as an Agency in the Formation of Edge Damage : An Experiment in Lithic Technology. Northwest Anthropological Research Notes 13 : 208–214.Google Scholar
Folk, R. 1980 Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. Hemphill, Austin.Google Scholar
Gifford, D. 1978 Ethnoarchaeological Observations of Natural Processes Affecting Cultural Materials. In Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology, edited by Gould, R., pp. 77–101. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Gifford, D., and Behrensmeyer, A. 1977 Observed Formation and Burial of a Recent Human Occupation Site in Kenya. Quaternary Research 8 : 245–266.Google Scholar
Gifford-Gonzalez, D., Damrosch, D., Pryor, J., and Thunen, R. 1985 The Third Dimension in Site Structure : An Experiment in Trampling and Vertical Dispersal. American Antiquity 50 : 803–818.Google Scholar
Hassan, F. 1978 Sediments in Archaeology : Methods and Implications for Paleoenvironmental and Cultural Analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology 5 : 197–213.Google Scholar
Hughes, P., and Lampert, R. 1977 Occupational Disturbance and Types of Archaeological Deposits. Journal of Archaeological Science 4 : 135–140.Google Scholar
Kirkby, A., and Kirkby, M. 1976 Geomorphic Processes and the Surface Survey of Archaeological Sites in Semi-arid Areas. In-Geoarchaeology , edited by Davison, D. and Shackley, M., pp. 229–253. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
Koike, H. 1987 Measurement of Soil Hardness of Floor Surface for a Reconstruction of Activity Patterns in a Prehistoric Dwelling. Asian Perspectives XXVII:5–13.Google Scholar
Liddle, M. 1975 A Selective Review of the Ecological Effects of Human Trampling on Natural Ecosystems. Biological Conservation 7 : 17–36.Google Scholar
Lindauer, O., and Kisselburg, J. 1981 Primary and Secondary Breakage. Paper presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, San Diego.Google Scholar
Muckle, R. 1985 Archaeological Considerations of Bivalve Shell Taphonomy. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver.Google Scholar
O'Connell, J. F. 1987 Alyawara Site Structure and its Archaeological Implications. American Antiquity 52 : 74–108.Google Scholar
Olsen, S., and Shipman, P. 1988 Surface Modification on Bone : Trampling Versus Butchery. Journal of Archaeological Science 15 : 535–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pintar, E. 1987 Controles experimentales de desplazamientos y alteraciones de artefactos liticos en sedimentos arenosos : Aplicaciones arqueoldgicas. Unpublished Tesis de Licenciatura, Facultad de Filosofia y Letras, Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Pryor, J. 1988 The Effects of Human Trample [sic]. Damage on Lithics : A Consideration of Crucial Variables. Lithic Technology 17 : 45–50.Google Scholar
Rosen, A. 1986 Cities of Clay. The Geoarchaeology of Tells. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Rosen, A. 1989 Ancient Towns and City Sites : A View from the Microscope. American Antiquity 54 : 564–578.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M. 1983 Toward the Identification of Formation Processes. American Antiquity 48 : 675–706.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M. 1987 Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M., and Skibo, J. 1989 A Provisional Theory of Ceramic Abrasion. American Anthropologist 91 : 101–115.Google Scholar
Simms, S. R. 1988 The Archaeological Structure of a Bedouin Camp. Journal of Archaeological Science 15 : 197–211.Google Scholar
Stein, J., and Teltser, P. 1989 Size Distributions of Artifact Classes : Combining Macro-and Micro-Fractions. Geoarchaeology : An International Journal 4 : 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockton, E. 1973 Shaw's Creek Shelter : Human Displacement of Artifacts and Its Significance. Mankind 9 : 112–117.Google Scholar
Tringham, R., Cooper, G., Odell, G., Voytek, B., and Whitman, A. 1974 Experimentation in the Formation of Edge Damage : A New Approach to Lithic Analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology 1 : 171–196.Google Scholar
Villa, P., and Courtin, J. 1983 The Interpretation of Stratified Sites : A View From Underground. Journal of Archaeological Science 10 : 267–281.Google Scholar
Weaver, T., and Dale, D. 1978 Trampling Effects of Hikers, Motorcycles and Horses in Meadows and Forests. Journal of Applied Ecology 15 : 451^157.Google Scholar
Whittlesey, S. M., Arnould, E. J., and Reynolds, W. E. 1982 Archaeological Sediments : Discourse, Experiment, and Application. In Multidisciplinary Research at Grasshopper Pueblo, Arizona, edited by Longacre, W. A., Holbrook, S. J., and Graves, M. W., pp. 28–35. Anthropological Papers No. 40. University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Wilk, R., and Schiffer, M. 1979 The Archaeology of Vacant Lots in Tucson, Arizona. American Antiquity 44 : 530–536.Google Scholar